Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libstripper
So Nancy holds back the Articles of Impeachment until she is assured of no corruption in the Senate. (Now she knows how Trump felt about giving aid to Ukraine.)

But, what if the Senate wants to see the House's Articles of Impeachment before writing the Senate's procedures and rules that Nancy so desperately wants to see?

Sounds like a classic stand-off....or dare we say quid pro quo?

Nancy is therefore guilty of "Obstruction of Senate" which is a crime I just made up out of whole cloth just like the 2nd Article of Impeachment.

16 posted on 12/19/2019 8:28:59 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SERKIT

Isn’t there at least one witness who’s testimony remains a secret because it exculpates Trump? Then of course there is the fake whistleblower. Perhaps Nancy just wants to know if these two will be called. If Mitch announces they will, Nancy will hold the articles of impeachment forever.


40 posted on 12/19/2019 8:35:08 AM PST by pnut22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT
Here is where to secure Palousie and jerk Shumer and Shifty Shifft,Swalmouth and other dark,evil Demoncrap traitors !

tritorchir-zps0807cdd4

132 posted on 12/19/2019 10:47:16 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson