Skip to comments.
Recently Retired USAF General Makes Eyebrow Raising Claims About Advanced Space Technology
The War Room ^
| Brett Tingley
Posted on 12/19/2019 4:24:41 AM PST by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
This technology can be built today with technology that is not developmental to deliver any human being from any place on planet Earth to any other place in less than an hour."Huh?
To: RoosterRedux
My first thought was that he couldn’t be talking about a transporter, because that would be instantaneous.
But my second thought was they were probably using a Windows-based solution, and that’s why it takes most of an hour, because it shuts down to do an update when you try to use it...
2
posted on
12/19/2019 4:34:41 AM PST
by
chrisser
To: RoosterRedux
This is probably true. By itself, it is not all that revolutionary. The ability to deliver a functioning weapon system, anywhere on earth, in under an hour, changes the military equation quite a bit. Better to be able to deliver a functioning drone anywhere else on the planet, in under an hour. That is much easier than delivering a human, and is well within our capabilities.
Space offers much more than that. It is the ultimate "high ground".
3
posted on
12/19/2019 4:35:00 AM PST
by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: RoosterRedux
Good luck up armoring a space capsule.
4
posted on
12/19/2019 4:35:00 AM PST
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: RoosterRedux
Best educated guess as someone who follows science.
1. Teleportation. Yes, they have already teleported subatomic particles, and even molecules. Obviously working the way up to more complex and larger matter. What they report, is probably years behind what has been accomplished.
2. Supersonic aircraft. Supersonic aircraft utility was blocked by sonic booms for common transport. New powerplant designs and new airframe designs likely soon allow high speed launches and landings to cross the globe in under an hour. This may already be a reality.
To: chrisser
6
posted on
12/19/2019 4:37:35 AM PST
by
RoosterRedux
(Trump to Pelosi: By proceeding with impeachment...you are declaring open war on American Democracy)
To: marktwain
7
posted on
12/19/2019 4:38:39 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: wastoute
That would be easy.
Getting it into actual space is the hard part.
8
posted on
12/19/2019 4:40:51 AM PST
by
RandallFlagg
(Fact: Gun control laws kill innocents.)
To: wastoute
You dont need armor if you can outrun/evade all the ordnance.
9
posted on
12/19/2019 4:45:46 AM PST
by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Pete Dovgan
Amazon Prime. That is, if you order in the next 47 minutes...
10
posted on
12/19/2019 4:48:00 AM PST
by
Hatteras
To: RoosterRedux
This is why we have a new branch of the armed services, Space Corp.
11
posted on
12/19/2019 4:49:16 AM PST
by
eartick
(Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
To: RoosterRedux
Perhaps this is the tech that the navy has been hinting about over the past year.
What would this do to Boeing stock? GM?
What is the energy source?
Looks to me like the market will be doing some serious capital re-allocation over the next 10 years.
12
posted on
12/19/2019 4:50:02 AM PST
by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: RoosterRedux
I would guess that he's talking about launching people in a ballistic missile-type system similar to the Minuteman III or such; the time of flight would be about one half hour from point-to-point, not allowing for deceleration.
The big issues would be that deceleration, the numbers and volume and mass required for a significant number of combatants, their weapons and equipment and some reasonable sustainment.
Just sending a couple of soldiers into space and then landing them somewhere would not be particularly worthwhile. You need mass.
13
posted on
12/19/2019 4:50:29 AM PST
by
Chainmail
(Remember that half the people you meet are below average intelligence)
To: RandallFlagg
Exactly what I meant. What does it cost to boost a kilo of mass into space? How much does it cost to destroy what we send to space? Seems to me the risk benefit is inverted. A space force will be hopelessly earth bound and purely defensive, seems to me.
14
posted on
12/19/2019 4:50:35 AM PST
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: RoosterRedux
"The technology is on the engineering benches today. ... But I’ve had the benefit of 33 years of studying and becoming friends with these scientists. This technology can be built today with technology that is not developmental to deliver any human being from any place on planet Earth to any other place in less than an hour." 'Technology on the engineering benches today' and 'this technology can be built today' means to me, whatever technology he's talking about is still in the 'development' stage but he believes it can be engineered.
Is he talking 'in theory' or is he claiming the engineering theory has been proven true and CAN be engineered?
To: chrisser
16
posted on
12/19/2019 4:51:51 AM PST
by
Frapster
(Don't tread on me.)
To: Chainmail
Being able to deliver one guy anywhere in an hour at what cost? A $Trillion?
17
posted on
12/19/2019 4:51:59 AM PST
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: wastoute
18
posted on
12/19/2019 4:54:21 AM PST
by
wally_bert
(Your methods were a little incomplete, you too for that matter.)
To: RoosterRedux
Hypersonic. We have that technology since the 60s and been refining it ever since. Skipping over the atmosphere like a rock skipping over water, fast and versatile.
Kwast is one of the true good guys. Smart, moral, gifted aviator. Ive known him since the early 90s.
19
posted on
12/19/2019 4:54:42 AM PST
by
Hulka
To: chrisser
20
posted on
12/19/2019 4:57:38 AM PST
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson