Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXTORTION: Nancy Pelosi Threatens to Withhold Impeachment Articles from Senate Republicans
Townhall.com ^ | December 18, 2019 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 12/19/2019 3:31:46 AM PST by Kaslin

Well, the final vote in the House of Representatives was not a shocker. House Democrats' lust to impeach President Trump on some shoddy quid pro quo allegation over military aid to Ukraine passed after nearly 12 hours of debate. As Katie wrote, the vote was 229-198-1. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), a 2020 Democratic candidate, voted present, while Reps. Jeff Van Drew (D-NJ) and Collin Peterson (D-MN) voted with Republicans against this witch-hunt.

Today was truly a clown show, with scores of Democrats trying to make the case that Trump is an existential threat to the United States. There was a lot of hot air. The evidence against Trump is the very definition of weak sauce. It’s so thin and so nakedly partisan that swing-state voters are sour on impeachment. This move by Democrats has increased the president’s popularity. It hasn’t moved the needle. In fact, the approval numbers for impeachment are now underwater. It has done the exact opposite of what Democrats had hoped, and this could be one massive in-kind contribution to the 2020 Trump campaign. Maybe within the leadership, they know this too, but they’re at the point of no return. They promised their base impeachment and it very well could allow Trump to cruise to re-election.

Knowing that the Republican Senate will dispense of their so-called evidence for impeachment, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has threatened to withhold transmitting the articles to the upper chamber. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has already rejected Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D-NY) parameters for the trial. McConnell slapped them down, along with cutting through the nonsense about his role in this Democrat-manufactured fantasy. He’s not going to be impartial.

“I'm not an impartial juror. This is a political process. There's not anything judicial about it,” he said on Tuesday. 

Knowing these articles face certain death with Senate Republicans, Pelosi and House Democrats now appear to be engaging in political extortion. Just watch. This is all about Senate Republicans rejecting Democratic calls for witnesses. That’s not how this works, lady. You folks, the House Democrats, decided what’s impeachable. The Senate holds a trial based on your work. And your work is total and complete nonsense.

Nancy Pelosi won't commit to sending the House Democrats' sham articles of impeachment over to the Senate.

Basically confirming what we've known all along this impeachment is a WITCH HUNT & A SHAM! pic.twitter.com/2KGQBkIsSE— Francis Brennan (@FrancisBrennan) December 19, 2019

Pelosi indicates the House may hold the articles of impeachment and not send then to the Senate until it’s understood the Senate will conduct a fair trial— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) December 19, 2019

If Trump is so dangerous to the country and the world, why wait?!?!?! https://t.co/lMzqp3bw5R— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) December 19, 2019

“We’ll decide what that dynamic is,” Pelosi told reporters after the vote. Politico has more:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi warned the House may not immediately transmit articles of impeachment to the Senate out of concerns Republicans won't conduct impartial proceedings at a trial.

Pelosi refused to commit to any timeline for sending the articles, which is required to begin the impeachment trial.

"So far, we haven't seen anything that looks fair to us," Pelosi told reporters shortly after the House approved two articles of impeachment against Trump. "But right now, the president is impeached."

Well, that’s not your call, Nancy. Your party is not the majority in the senate. We’re the majority. And we’re going to end this clown show. The longer you hang onto this the more popular Trump becomes and the more key swing states Democrats need to win in 2020 fall further out of reach. So, please, keep playing this game. Oh, and removing Trump from office requires 67 Senators. This just isn’t in the works. 

The irony is thick. Democrats think Trump is dangerous and must be removed because he abuses his power, and we have Democrats abusing their power to try and get Trump removed from the Oval Office, possibly sending us into a constitutional crisis with these games. To save the Constitution, we have to destroy the Constitution. We have to shred parts and go around others. That’s quite the formula there for salvation, though one that could only come from the mind of a historically illiterate and petulant Democrat. They’re just giving us this election.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2020election; frameup; housedemonrats; impeachment; nancypiglosi; politicalpersecution; presidenttrump; riggedgame; senaterepublicans; soviettrial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last
To: familyop

interesting theory - not sure it would hold to closer scrutiny


101 posted on 12/19/2019 9:55:23 AM PST by Godzilla ( I just love the smell of COVFEFE in the morning . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ken Regis

Then the Senate can return it and let the Republicans void it.


102 posted on 12/19/2019 9:55:43 AM PST by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Ken Regis

Yes, it would.


103 posted on 12/19/2019 9:56:10 AM PST by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
The constitution is approximately silent on process and procedure.

Who starts the criminal trial, the judge or the prosecutor? When is the prosecutor done with the case?

That rough outline is the same in impachment. The House is charging, the Senate is trying. When does the Senate become engaged? Is it supposed to go fetch articles? Is it supposed to argue the case to itself?

104 posted on 12/19/2019 9:59:09 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

she has to inform the senate who the house managers are. They present the case for impeachment in the trial in the senate


105 posted on 12/19/2019 10:00:16 AM PST by olesigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: olesigh

She DID inform the Senate. She informed all Americans. Senators are Americans. When impeachment laws and rules were established, there wasn’t 24/7 media, and instant information.

Mitch can begin the trial. She can make a presentation for impeachment or not. Her choice. Maybe she’ll decide to take her dollies and go home and pout.


106 posted on 12/19/2019 10:42:02 AM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: timestax
Here is where to secure Palousie and jerk Shumer and Shifty Shifft,Swalmouth and other dark,evil Demoncrap traitors !

tritorchir-zps0807cdd4

107 posted on 12/19/2019 10:44:54 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Dusty Road

Read the constitution.


108 posted on 12/19/2019 2:59:36 PM PST by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson