“Republicans for the Rule of Law” - Who dat?
Another Soros front?
Mitt Romney and the ghost of John McCain?
Does not sound like “Republican” group to me.
When you stand for nothing, you are vulnerable to anything. But this one is out of graham’s hands. Executive Privilege still stands in a senate trial. Sure they can go to court, but I think you need to have real evidence to breach EP. And hearsay is not it.
Probably never-Trumpers.
More traitors.
Names meaning nothing
They’re obviously trying to help Graham with his re-election. Pretty unusual for liberals to help Republicans re-up.
Kcuf George Conway...and his wife...at this point...
Rats at work in disguise
“Once upon a time Lindsey Graham was in favor of a fair impeachment trial,” a terrorist says in the 30-second ad.
Edited for accuracy.
I don’t understand something. The House is the “discovery and indictment” part of this process. They have DONE the investigation, discovered he evudence. Now, the Senate is to be a jury and RULE on that evidence. Ted Cruz in Fox this morning was talking about witnesses in the Senate trial. Since when is a jury allowed to call a witness? What the hell are they doing?
And Nancy Pelosi once said this ... (replace the word Republican with Democrat)
“Today the Republican majority is not judging the president with fairness, but impeaching him with a vengeance,” then-House Minority Leader Pelosi declared in December 1998.
She continued, “In the investigation of the president, fundamental principles which Americans hold dear – fairness, privacy, checks and balances – have been seriously violated, and why? Because we are here today because the Republicans in the House are paralyzed with hatred of President Clinton. ... Until the Republicans free themselves of that hatred, our country will suffer.”