Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: silverleaf

“Logically, we are spending a lot of money on NATO defense vs Russia, while this brings Russian gas into Germany and adds to their future energy vulnerability.”

How does the addition of a pipeline, one of the safest methods for transporting fuel, detract from Europe’s energy security? This is nothing but a bully move by the Uniparty to secure their bribes from Ukraine.


18 posted on 12/17/2019 12:16:25 PM PST by wildcard_redneck (If the Trump Administration doesn't prosecute the coup plotters he loses the election in 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: wildcard_redneck

“” “” How does the addition of a pipeline, one of the safest methods for transporting fuel, detract from Europe’s energy security? This is nothing but a bully move by the Uniparty to secure their bribes from Ukraine.”” “”

That’s it. The entire ‘energy security’ is a false narrative. The presence of Russian pipeline doesn’t prohibit anyone to build another one or ship gas either way.


21 posted on 12/17/2019 12:21:42 PM PST by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: wildcard_redneck

We do spend a lot of money on Europe’s defense. Defense against a non-existent threat. The Russian army is about 10% of the size it was in 1989 when the wall fell. And the best way to not even need NATO is a healthy robust trade relationship between Russia and Europe. That is if peace is really the goal. In truth, there is a lot of money to be made by the connected people by the continuation of the Cold War.


25 posted on 12/17/2019 12:42:13 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson