Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reviving an Industry: A Cheer for the Trump Uranium Plan
Townhall ^ | 12/17/2019 | Stephen Moore

Posted on 12/17/2019 8:44:25 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Our sources are telling us that President Trump is nearing a decision on how to revive the all-but-dormant American uranium industry. This proposed plan would create a reserve of domestically mined uranium stored in a "Federal Uranium Security Stockpile." One option on the table is for the Department of Defense to purchase uranium through the 1950 Defense Production Act.

The president concluded in July that: "The United States requires domestically produced uranium to satisfy DOD requirements for maintaining effective military capabilities," including the Navy's nuclear fleet.

Uranium is used for America's nuclear arsenal as well as domestic nuclear power plants. The U.S. reactor fleet purchased about 40 million pounds of uranium last year. But American production of uranium has fallen steadily over the last 30 years, and the nuclear power industry now gets 90% of its uranium through imports from nations like Canada, Australia, Russia and Kazakhstan. Only a few small American mines remain open.

The Trump administration's assessment is that the risk of any shortage of uranium and the attendant disruption to security and nuclear power production would be far higher to the American economy than the cost of building a domestic reserve -- which is estimated at $1 billion to $1.5 billion over the next decade.

While we believe this solution is far from ideal because it imposes new costs on taxpayers, this plan is superior to what many in government and in the uranium industry were seeking: tariffs on imported uranium or a 25% domestic market quota on foreign imports.

These kinds of trade barriers would have potentially incited retaliatory actions from foreign nations while raising prices of uranium used by U.S. nuclear power plants. This would only make nuclear energy a more expensive power source at a time when natural gas is very cheap and when the nuclear industry is struggling to compete with billions of dollars of government subsidies to the wind and solar industries.

But it is equally important that, while establishing this reserve, Trump endorse and set in place longer-term solutions that would not cost taxpayers a penny. At the top of that list is for the feds and state governments to remove the thicket of regulatory barriers to domestic mining of dozens of minerals and rare Earth metals. These resources are necessary for everything from cellphones to medical equipment to satellites to high-powered electric batteries.

The rapid demise in America's mining industry is nothing short of scandalous. Thirty years ago, the United States was one of the world leaders in mining, but according to the latest federal geological survey, the United States is now nearly 99% dependent on imports for at least 20 critical and strategic minerals.

The problem is not that America is running out of mineral resources or that American miners can't compete. Ned Mamula, a former natural resource expert with the Department of the Interior, reports in his latest book, "Groundbreaking!" that the United States sits atop some $5 trillion of mineral resources -- most of it on federal lands. High-grade uranium can be mined in states such as Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Texas.

The decline is a result of a war against mining waged by liberal environmental groups that have selectively hampered or even shut down production of everything from coal to copper to rare Earth minerals and now to uranium.

Permitting for a new mine often takes a decade or longer in the U.S. versus five years or less in countries like Australia and Canada. Environmental laws and nuisance lawsuits are a financial impediment to domestic mining as well. The United States appropriately has strict rules to protect water supplies and wildlife, but the laws in many states and from Washington have become de facto mining prohibitions.

This has merely transferred mining operations to places like Russia, China and Africa, where environmental protections are nearly nonexistent -- and thus pollution is much worse.

Another irony of this war on uranium production is that nuclear power supplies roughly half of America's clean energy supply at affordable prices and with high reliability. If the left truly wants a "carbon-free" future for the United States, it is almost inconceivable that this could be achieved without abundant nuclear power production -- a message that Microsoft founder Bill Gates and others have been making for years. The left's crusade against domestic uranium could hardly be more self-defeating.

One last point. While this national security stockpile may be necessary to get American uranium production back up and running, Trump should make it very clear that this is a one-time commitment, not a lifelong subsidy to the industry. We have seen from decades of subsidies to industries like solar, wind and biofuels that government handouts become de facto entitlements and impair an industry's road to free market profitability.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: uranium

1 posted on 12/17/2019 8:44:25 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Our sources are telling us that President Trump is nearing a decision on how to revive the all-but-dormant American uranium industry. This proposed plan would create a reserve of domestically mined uranium stored in a "Federal Uranium Security Stockpile."

So Trump asks Congress if they want to make a FUSS, and they say "Hell, yeah!", pass the bill, and he leaves them standing there with their thumb up their butt wondering what happened.

2 posted on 12/17/2019 8:48:49 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wyoming also has substantial Uranium reserves. I worked at the Highland Uranium Mine in Wyoming in the late 70’s. At the time, the Highland Mine was both an underground and a surface mine. Later in-situ mining became predominate there.


3 posted on 12/17/2019 9:08:03 AM PST by Tall Wall Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They should investigate and figure out if there was bribery associated with the Uranium One deal, and if there was, they should reverse the sale.


4 posted on 12/17/2019 9:23:50 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Raw material is one thing. The ability to enrich uranium in to a useable form is another. Is the centrifuge project in New Mexico America’s only facility capable on enriching uranium? The old gaseous diffusion plants are no more.


5 posted on 12/17/2019 10:15:42 AM PST by buckalfa (The best two years of my life were spent in the third grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The decline is a result of a war against mining waged by liberal environmental groups that have selectively hampered or even shut down production of everything from coal to copper to rare Earth minerals and now to uranium.

Permitting for a new mine often takes a decade or longer in the U.S. versus five years or less in countries like Australia and Canada. Environmental laws and nuisance lawsuits are a financial impediment to domestic mining as well.

This will be another YUGE victory for working Americans and the green cry babies will go crazy.

American mining is being stopped for no reason, other than socialism, and the left's goal to Make America Weak Again.

6 posted on 12/17/2019 10:27:46 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist mooselimb savages, today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We need to revive and restock our strategic reserves in quite a number of areas, and uranium is a good place to start. Trump understands that part of deterrence (and part of fighting a war and winning it if deterrence fails) is to be ready to massively boost production of war materials very quickly with reserves that are already in place.


7 posted on 12/17/2019 10:52:11 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We need to continue research into extracting uranium from sea water. We are almost profitable doing that. That would go around all the environmental concerns, and supply us with a near infinite supply of uranium.


8 posted on 12/17/2019 10:53:51 AM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Maybe if the russians would return our uranium that they bribed the clintons and obama for. By chance do the Iranians have it?


9 posted on 12/17/2019 3:59:06 PM PST by minnesota_bound (homeless guy. He just has more money....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson