Posted on 12/17/2019 8:35:13 AM PST by Kaslin
Now that the House is set to impeach President Trump for what its Nadler-led Judiciary Committee decided were “impeachable offenses,” it is time to consider what will or, more important, should happen in a Senate trial. In my view, no matter the utter lack of substance in the articles of impeachment certain to be approved by the House this week, the president should prepare to mount a vigorous defense and Senate Republican leaders should assist, not impede him.
As an Impeachment Manager in the 1999 trial of former President Clinton, I learned very early that an impeachment trial in the Senate has little in common with “normal” trials that take place daily in federal and state courtrooms according to well-established rules of procedure.
Each and every impeachment that crosses the Capitol Rotunda from the House to the Senate, comes without any pre-existing rules of procedure for the trial, whether for a federal judge or a president of the United States. The Senate must adopt by simple majority vote unique rules for the conduct of each and every impeachment trial, including whether to allow live witnesses to testify and the scope of evidence to be admitted. These are extremely important tactical decisions and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell must not allow Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to massage them into pablum.
It is important the president keep these procedural nuances in mind as he decides who will represent him in the upcoming trial, and what strategy to pursue.
he situation will be very different from the one Clinton faced two decades ago. In January 1999, the Democrat president confronted a Republican-led Senate. Yet, even in those circumstances, the Senate adopted procedures for Clinton’s trial that severely handicapped the ability of the House Impeachment Managers (including myself) to prosecute the case against him – allowing no live witnesses and severely restricting the evidence that could be presented.
The restrictive rules under which we were forced to proceed in January and February 1999, reflected the fact that the Senate – even under Republican control – had no stomach for an impeachment trial, notwithstanding the strong evidence developed by the Independent Counsel’s Office and the House Judiciary Committee that Clinton clearly had violated federal criminal laws against perjury and obstruction of justice.
Now, 21 years later, a Republican president will face a Senate majority of his own party. Trump would be well-advised not to presume the GOP-controlled Senate will necessarily protect his interests in establishing the parameters for his trial. It is Trump’s future that will be on the line there, not that of any Senator and the forum in which he defends that legacy must be one that allows him to present as broad a defense as he desires.
Unlike the substantive articles on which Clinton was impeached, those presented by the House Judiciary Committee against Trump are astounding in their weakness. They lack even the pretense of substance, relying on the vaguest notions of “abuse of office” and “obstruction of Congress.” Thrown into the mix at the last minute by the Judiciary Committee in its report, are bizarre charges that the president is a “threat to national security” and that he “betrayed the nation.” Rather than strengthen the already weak case developed by the Judiciary Committee (and the Intelligence Committee before it), such hyperbole simply confirms that the report is nothing but a political hit job.
With this background, the only substantive record with which the Senate, the American people, and history will be able to fairly judge President Trump, will be that presented publicly in the Senate trial. In fairness to the president and to that history, this must include live witness testimony, including from the so-called whistleblower, along with any others the president desires. This is the only way for him to place into full and fair context all that body of evidence the House Democrat majority chose to ignore.
To present that defense, Trump must have a legal team chosen by him and for him -- strong, single-minded individuals dedicated to vindicating him completely, and savvy as to the Senators who will determine his constitutional fate. Members of the team should possess a variety of skills but be fully complementary. Some of those members may already be working with Trump, others not yet, but each and every one must be mindful that they will be defending not only a president unjustly accused, but a Constitution deeply damaged in the rush to judgment by House Democrats.
Trump and the GOP must mount a vigorous OFFENSE:
Which (aside from Durham which may come too late) may include:
1. Publicly start announcing plans for a 2020 House GOP Impeachment inquiry of Obama (yes we can) to investigate his role in Spygate.
2. Effective “impeachment inquiry (and call it that) of House Dems for Abuse of Power by trivializing impeachment, with verdict rendered by voters on 11/3/2020.
3. Threaten to find and declassify tapas or transcripts of any conversations Obama, Clinton, or any other Democrats had where they were requesting anything from leaders of any foreign countries that receive anything from us. This is perfectly justified as it would also be a legitimate defense to contrast Trump’s requests with standard practices of other leaders.
4. Etc. Etc.
The best defense is a good offense!
It is Trump’s future that will be on the line there, not that of any Senator...
This statement is completely wrong. The support for Trump is much stronger than the support for any of the GOP senators. If any of our GOP senators give Trump less than 100% support, that is the end of their political careers. Forever.
If by some chance, enough GOP senators conspire with the Dems to fix to rules to embarrass Trump and damage his reelection chances, that is the end of the Republican party. Forever.
I say this as a 55 year old man who has voted for every Republican federal candidate in every election since I was eligible to vote in 1982. I will never vote for another Republican candidate again if they undermine my duly elected President. I will sit on the sidelines and wait for a conservative party to emerge after the GOP dies. And I don't think I'm alone in this.
I sincerely hope every Republican senator realizes what is at stake, for their personal legacy.
The articles that the House wrote up are BS. SCOTUS already took the air out of the phony obstruction of Congress.
A Senate trial will never end. This fuster cluck will continue until Trump retires from his office in 5 years.
I guess I only have half a brain.
And for God's sake keep Rudy off it.
But seriously, has the Cippilone begun pulling the team together yet? It's likely that the Senate trial is less than a month away.
Trump shouldn’t defend himself. Only people that did something wrong defend themselves!
If Trump tries to defend himself, he’ll lose the moderate voter!
/tru con.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.