I’ve been told that the “League of Women Voters” is also “non-partisan”.
https://capitalresearch.org/article/lwv/
League of Women Voters
A Legacy of Liberal Issues and Causes
By John Gizzi, Organization Trends, November 2015 (PDF here)
Summary: The 95-year-old League of Women Voters isn’t quite what it seems. It has long enjoyed an enviable reputation as a nonideological, nonpartisan, good-government group, but contrary to popular belief, it supports Democratic candidates for public office and left-wing policies. The liberal nonprofit favors the pro-choice side of the abortion debate, a clampdown on how much can be donated to political campaigns, and imposing stronger, economy-damaging environmental regulations. (The League was previously profiled in the March 2000 issue of Organization Trends.)...
YOu must mean the league of Demorat women votes. Years ago I cancelled a local debate hosted by the LDW because out of 24 women on the board, all 24 were registered democrats.
“I’ve been told that the “League of Women Voters” is also ‘non-partisan’.”
Yeah; they’re not. I was in charge of elections in our city back in the ‘80s. Even then they were vile liberal hags. I cringed every time I handed a ballot to one of them to be taken to a shut-in. I never REALLY knew who filled out the ballot.
Oh, you mean the League of Women Vipers?
Kinda like that impartial Snopes site, right?