Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tcrlaf

Of course they have no shame. Thus, no way to shame them. But, when the Senate trial starts, and witnesses are allowed to be questioned including the “whistleblower”, if they had any sense of shame they would be looking for a hole to get into. Oh well, their empty headed audience won’t have a clue.


64 posted on 12/14/2019 10:47:39 PM PST by Sir Bangaz Cracka (Sweet Saint Skittles bounced dat ole white Craka head off da sidewalk causin he was real skeered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Bangaz Cracka
But, when the Senate trial starts, and witnesses are allowed to be questioned including the “whistleblower”,

There won't be any witnesses, despite what we are hearing.

To call witnesses gives legitimacy to this kangaroo court sham. Furthermore, any trial lawyer will tell you that calling a witness is always a very tricky thing. It can easily blow up in your face.

The Senate could introduce a motion to dismiss, but they would be accused of a "cover up." McConnell will most likely allow the House managers to prattle on, followed by a quick rebuttal from Trump's attorneys, followed by a quick floor vote from the Senators.

Q.E.D.

74 posted on 12/15/2019 3:44:02 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson