Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Besides being bad for the economy, it's also unconstitutional.
1 posted on 12/12/2019 5:38:01 PM PST by karpov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: karpov

“Besides being bad for the economy, it’s also unconstitutional. “

indeed. a so-called “wealth-tax” is nothing more than unconstitutional seizure of private property. period. just like the income tax, a “wealth tax” would require a Constitutional amendment ...


2 posted on 12/12/2019 5:40:54 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Lieawatha needs to send in all of her dough first.

As an example.

For the children.

Sounds like she wants to get too many beers first...


3 posted on 12/12/2019 5:45:25 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

If you have to sell everything, the price of everything will skyrocket - the other way.


4 posted on 12/12/2019 6:12:42 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Free Stuff cost a lot.


5 posted on 12/12/2019 6:17:19 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

“Billionaire sale. Everything must go to pay taxes. Best offer!”

“I’ll give you a million.”

“Wait. Now I’m not a billionaire any more. I don’t owe any taxes.”

“Too late. Give me my stuff.”

“Well, now you owe the taxes.”

“Why? This stuff isn’t worth a billion!”


6 posted on 12/12/2019 6:17:44 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Who’s going to buy everything that gets sold?


7 posted on 12/12/2019 6:18:45 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (The internet has driven the world mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

It would destroy asset markets.


8 posted on 12/12/2019 6:22:30 PM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Just typical posturing - propose something radical so that the eventual, Left-of-today “compromise” seems reasonable by comparison.


10 posted on 12/12/2019 6:27:20 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Or they could just ‘Go Galt’....
The only question is how they do it. Like Galt, like Fransisco, or like Ragnar.


12 posted on 12/12/2019 6:49:15 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

She is one crazy old bitch!


13 posted on 12/12/2019 7:11:41 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (I'm triggered by liberals and other assorted moonbats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Why do they keep calling it “Elizabeth Warren’s proposed wealth tax”?

It’s Karl Marx’s.


15 posted on 12/12/2019 8:13:42 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

She’s a moron going nowhere


17 posted on 12/12/2019 8:45:27 PM PST by Truthoverpower (The guv mint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

An unintended consequence is ‘that many people’ selling off assets in a short period of time will crash prices of everything from art to vacation homes. What a nightmare.


18 posted on 12/12/2019 9:05:56 PM PST by GOPJ (Will Chris Wallace kiss Comey's butt on-air - or after the show is over... (Sunday Morning))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

“That adds up to a total federal tax rate of 58.2%, more than double the current maximum 23.8% on long-term capital gains. For a California taxpayer who would also be required to pay the state’s 13.3% income tax, the total state and federal income taxes to raise the funds to pay Ms. Warren’s 6% federal wealth tax would be 71.5%. “

I think I’m going to cry.


20 posted on 12/12/2019 9:15:52 PM PST by Concentrate (ex-texan was right and Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Most USA millionaires are private business owners.

How will that work?

Will an army of IRS appraisers calculate the monetary value of businesses they know almost nothing about?

And, even more important, most business owners DO NOT WANT partners or shareholders.

That means the asset tax will come straight out of their take home pay, or it will have to be borrowed.

And the “2%” asset tax is extremely deceptive.

That is NOT an extra 2% of income tax. That is 2% on the total value of your business EVERY YEAR.

In a bad year, that 2% could swallow 100% of your take home pay.

Complete insanity.


21 posted on 12/13/2019 3:38:21 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson