Good point- I think the person who altered the document to change its meaning is going to end up indicted and hopefully found guilty.
I was mainly referring to the bias that was clear from the texts where to do more than remove them from their jobs some crime must be proven.
As for Rush,he’s just pandering to his audience, because he knows very well that no grand jury is going to indict anyone without probable cause that a crime was committed.
What is the crime? Mean-tweeting? Locker-room bragging? Trying to impress the girlfriend? Remember these things work both ways ( i.e Access Hollywood tape).
But people should realize that when you use “company's property” to communicate with a fellow love bird and discuss the undermining of a president, your future boss, then you should realize that that information is not private and might be used against you — in the court of public opinion or an actual court with a judge. Which begs the question — are they stupid? Strzok and Page seemed to think that they were smart. Their texts are oozing with arrogance.
The same thing could be said for this lawyer. Heck a lawyer of all people should know to be careful what they put in emails.
Anyway, back to your point. We all probably think and say things that we would normally keep private but now we happily document our thoughts for all posterity and all to see in emails, texts, blog posts, etc.