A smart sixth grader can see it the bias.
Consider: Imagine you’re investigating the validity of a science experiment. The scientists are pleased with their findings, but you have some questions about their procedures.
You discover 17 separate “errors” were made, all of which supported the favored results. Is this random error? Or would you conclude that the experiment was biased by the hopes of those conducting it?
You look further and find e-mails between the scientists indicating a strong desire for a certain outcome. Do you conclude “no bias”? Or that experimenters consciously influenced the outcome?
When you see headlines on print or cable news claiming “no bias” in the Trump investigation, know that they came from people who were either dumber than a sixth grader or were simply lying to you.
A smart sixth grader can see it the bias.
problem is dems and msm and their aides aren’t smarter than a 5th grader...where does that leave horowitz?
“You discover 17 separate “errors” were made, all of which supported the favored results. Is this random error?”
Hubby is PhD in Physics. When I told him about these 17 errors, all benefiting one side, the calculator in his head started clicking away. And then he shook his head in disbelief.
Horowitz just said he can’t say that there was no bias in the Page application. He has said that repeatedly. He has only said he couldn’t find evidence of bias in the predication of crossfire hurricane.