He just said something I hadn’t heard before, that he did not find political bias for opening the CH investigation, a decision that was made by Bill Priestap, Strozk’s boss. I don’t think I’ve every seen anything that says Priestap was politically biased. He was the boss of people who were, but who hasn’t presented something to their boss without fully disclosing their own thoughts about it?
“Documentary or Testimonial Evidence” means no one we talked to admitted to it, provided any written proof of it, or was willing to testify that someone else did it.
How are the emails not regarded as “documentary evidence”?
Hopefully, one of the Senators will ask about this. It seems to me that Carter Page was selected for surveillance only because he had a connection to Trump. Why else was he targeted, if he had been a CIA informant up to that point? He was the gateway to the Trump campaign because he had connections to Russia. The FBI knew that.
“he did not find political bias for opening the CH investigation, a decision that was made by Bill Priestap, Strozk’s boss.”
That’s very interesting. I’d forgotten all about him, and he was in the thick of this when it was happening. And they’re relying on HIM to make good decisions and direction? Sheesh!
For a while there was gossip that Priestap had flipped. Guess not.