There is mention on one of the videos on pyramid construction today that a study was done on 2 of the structures samples looking at the magnetic alignments of metals in the rocks - quarried stone would produce a random alignment due to random motions while moving and placing; a cast stone would have the same alignment as the magnetic pole in situ. All the samples had the same northerly ligament, not the random alignment expected from quarried stone.
Stone cannot be carbon dated, bio-thermoluminescence dating can tell when two stones were laid down, but not the date of the stone carving/shaping itself.
How many cores would it take to find one that had such material in it?; how much time do you want to spend?; how much money do you want to spend on testing hundreds or thousands of samples?
There are stone structures in SA that date back over 100,000 years ... there is a pyramid in SA larger and older that the Great Pyramid ...
“There are stone structures in SA that date back over 100,000 years ... there is a pyramid in SA larger and older that the Great Pyramid ...”
Yep, absolutely. Contrary to the popular narrative...