Mr. Durham says he’s reached a different conclusion.
“Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened,” Mr. Durham said in a statement.
Mr. Durham noted the inspector general’s authority was limited to information within the Justice Department, while his investigation found information from “other persons and entities both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/dec/9/john-durham-says-he-disagrees-doj-ig-conclusion-ru/
(Durham) “last month we advised the Inspector General”
So Horowitz is willfully covering up...
Mifsud and the Italy trips.
I’m wondering if lying to or withholding evidence from the IG is a separate criminal offense. Of course Durham has other evidence that the DOJ either doesn’t have, or, did not turn over or events/conversations that witnesses did not admit.