Even with Strzok, Horowitz found no direct evidence of bias affecting his treatment of any case he handled. That was in the HIllary exoneration report that caused the FBI to be subjected to glowing praise and retraining.
True. I’m not going to say that Horowitz hasn’t been disappointing. Just trying to point out that it’s not an exoneration. I stick by my punting analogy. Horowitz outlines lots of misconduct but declines to draw conclusions on what motivated them. And since his access to evidence is limited, his reticence on this point is anything but an exoneration. The decision to prosecute has always rested with Durham and Barr and they’ve already weighed in on their disagreement with Horowitz on this point.