Posted on 12/06/2019 1:26:26 PM PST by Kaslin
YAWN!!! Not news.
Somebody call me if Schiffty ever tells the truth. Now that would be newsworthy. LOL
#3. Re “Another lie? How can that be”? Perhaps a lifetime of practice as a Democrat psychopath would explain things.
bttt
Thanks
Thanks
In slightly convoluted fashion, Pelousi recognizes that the Committee on the Judiciary doesn't have members or staff that are up to the tasks of questioning "experts" (what? no witnesses?) or navigating past the Fourth Amendment violations of wrested-and-grandiosely-lied-about phone records.
You probably recognized how completely scripted the back-and-forth between Dems, their counsel, their members and their experts was, right?
Unless it's Shillelagh Jackson Lee attempting to appear brighter than your average fence post, most have figured out that Democratic Congress member active participation has been ever increasingly curtailed. (Meanwhile, Republican member participation has been landing blow after blow.)
While Dem members can plausibly read a script set before them, they surely can't handle the thought processes of a substantive back-and-forth with (even Leftist blowhard) college professors given to lengthy pontification to fake a sense of natural flow.
So while the Dems have hired staff to do their bidding (on our tax dollar), they can't count on their membership to bring any dynamic, audience-felt sense of narrowing the closure toward a rising crescendo of PDJT's evidence-based deservedness, let alone the revelation of any smoking gun.
Enter Pelousi to demand Articles while most observers are still with, "Now, what would be the charge exactly?".
Turley is right. These proceedings don't rise to any reasonable standard of making a case for presidential impeachment. Instead of Pelousi using her usurped power over the committee, she should just let it die of its own ill-timed petard duddliness. It's a far better excuse that it just didn't roar out of the Judiciary Committee than to see all the Democratic corruption be exposed in a Senate Trial.
The Dems really need a good distraction to counter Durham's coming indictments. What is Pelousi left with? Bupkis!
You had me until the last line. Durham might get something. But I am discounting anything he does. Until we see it, let’s just assume it’s not going to happen.
Many things have been conjectured about what's behind her erratic behavior. I believe she knows that there's a mountain of coup-related evidence against her and the she needs plausible deflection for her possible forth-coming indictment related to those. She probably prefers to characterize possible indictment as retribution for her having achieved the impeachment of PDJT.
Wray is a dirty cop. You haven’t figured that out yet?
your allegation is just ridiculous. To make such a claim you must consider President Trump to be stupid.
Really? Stay tuned.
I’m sorry. I should have responded “Trust Sessions.” Correct?
Your original post indicated you are smarter than the President.
I’m sorry but you are not. You don’t measure up
Thanks, but that wasn’t my question. If it is proven to be Wray, that’s one thing. If any congressman can ‘order up’ an NSL that’s another issue....both very troublesome. Did Wray order the NSL that wad issued to AT&T? Sauce?
We know for a fact Trump ordered the release of the info on FISA abuse over a year ago. Wray has yet to comply. This alone should be enough but...SHAMWOW! Wait, there’s more. The FBI is dirty top down and has been for at least 4 years.
Handing out phone numbers of the President of the United States attorney and a US Congressman serving as ranking minority of the intelligence committee? They did not see the name on the phone bill of the phone number?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.