Even a narrow definition.
Oh, no, this is completely wrong. DemocRAT Socialists, by definition, cannot be corrupt. Therefore, Schiff-for-brains’ definition does NOT apply to Biden (or Pelosi or Sanders or any other leftist who uses public office for personal gain).
What is initially stated in the Constitution has been further refined by subsequent Supreme Court decisions, which have greatly narrowed the definition of bribery. Turley spoke of this process in his testimony, and the Dims ignored his statements to keep a nebulous and overly broad definition of bribery to suit their fantasies.
I’d be interested in learning more about how the Iran deal, where the Obama administration literally gave pallets of cash to terrorists, was in the nation’s interest and not bribery by this newly revised definition.
The Dims don’t care about Slow Joe; their hatred of Trump, er, trumps everything. They’ll willing to sacrifice anyone to bring him down.
When they lose BIG next November, it’ll be interesting to see where they point their wrath. Someone has to be the scapegoat. Shifty (and Nadler) bungled the impeachment, so they may be the target.
Can anyone give a reasonable explanation on why no prominent D has stepped to a microphone and question what Joe Biden said in that video? And why Hunter Biden and others were paid enormous sums of money by a shady Ukraine energy company?
Not one Democrat will ask the question or demand to know what was going on.
As others had said on FR, Trump is being impeached for what Joe Biden actually did in Ukraine.
If the standard is you can’t investigate a political rival running for office, than Democrats shouldn’t investigate Trump. Incidentally, that is exactly what Obama did in 2016 with Hillary’s foreign sourced dossier.
Thank God for alternative media.
Biden also directly implicates Obama in the Bribery/Extortion scheme. the Senate shuld Impeach Both Obama and Biden as soon as they get the case.