Had to find a picture after your description... She's no lipstick lesbian that's for sure!
As to your question.... who the hell knows?!
Her comment about Barron, were, I suppose, meant to be funny. I didn’t find it particularly offensive or dangerous to the boy, just plain stupid.
What was more striking to me - WHY was this prune-faced, bitter, leftist dyke even there?? She had no connection to Trump, Ukraine, Russia, State Department or anything connected to the proceedings at all.
It was a total embarrassment.
“WHY was this prune-faced, bitter, leftist dyke even there??”
Tucker had a segment on last night about this old crone. There was a clip where she talked about crossing the street to avoid walking past the Trump hotel in NY.
Honestly, would a rational, nominally adjusted human do such a thing?
BTW, Tucker Carlson is can’t miss lately. I love the way he laughs and mocks people like Karlan, and he’s taking on hedge funds and their destructive ways. Good stuff.
The problem was, it was a set up question and answer. The dear Professor didn’t just think it up in the moment, it was planned and thought out.
She was probably hoping she would make some cash off the T Shirt sales.
It was just like Kameltoe Harris nailing Quid Pro Joe at the Debate with her “I was that girl” rebuke. The T Shirts were already boxed up and ready to go as soon as the words came out of her Willie Brown abused Mouth.
Had to find a picture after your description... She's no lipstick lesbian that's for sure!
As to your question.... who the hell knows?!