Posted on 12/04/2019 7:13:37 AM PST by pulaskibush
Judiciary Hearing on Constitutional Framework for Impeachment. The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing with legal experts to discuss the constitutional framework for potentially drawing up articles of impeachment against President Trump.
FAcebook livestream CSPAN facebook
Conservative Breitbart livestream with likely better comments
The Nuremberg Trial it isn’t.
More like the LIMBERGER Trial. This stinks to high heaven
Wait’ll the R’s start asking questions.
The varsity team will be in charge.
Pam (Karlan) cracks me up. She’s used to speaking from the perspective of a teacher. She reminds me of that old Reagan phrase, about liberals, “they know so much that is not true.”
_______________
LOL
See # 48
She is hopefully going to hang herself as she seems to not have self-control!
Wow, she spent thanksgiving reading the transcripts & ate a turkey that was delivered to her.
What a drama queen..shes annoying as hell too.
She ATE A TURKEY that came in the mail already cooked ..... because she'd been doing all this work!!!!
LMAO
If the R’s play their cards right, she could actually be the source of the next “bombshell”.
This isnt fair. Its stacked, one sided and devoid of procedural and substantiative safeguards for the accused.
Nothing the President and the Republican minority could say would change Democrat minds or alter a preordained outcome.
Lets get it over with and vote. Democrats will do what Democrats do.
The don’t even ask her specific questions; they just ask to her to keep going!
How would you like THAT to show up as your blind date??!
Bribery, personal gain!
I ate mail order turkey!
.
Oh for pete's sake, calm down. Turley is a believer in the law.
I believe the R’s do have a chance to expose it for what it is. That is what they were able to do during the Shiff show and can do here, perhaps in spades. We’ll see.
This is just bad TV. Mama gonna be PO’ed if her soaps are not on.
___________
That's one woman I don't ever want to see with her crack up.
:-)
God I hope the Republicans do not drop the ball when it is in their court like they did with the Schiff hearings. They far too many times either did not follow up when they should have, or they never asked the correct blunt questions they should have asked.
Schiff’s committee hearings did not legally count, this one does indeed legally count.
Why are the Dems treating these 3 witnesses as if they are the Judge and Jury?????
Same opinion. The Dems relegating their responsibility to these “ professors”
These are people who have an opinion based on their readings or understanding.
It doesn’t mean they are the final word....
They are assuming that the President is worried about just how formidable Biden’s challenge will be. To the contrary Trump would love to run against Biden and would not want to impact his ability to get the democrat nomination.
The entire impeachment hinges on a false premise. President Trump would destroy Biden in a fair election and everyone knows it.
These legal experts are basing their opinions after hearing but ONE SIDE of the controversy. No due process. No right to confront your accuser. No presumption of innocence.
Kangaroo court. Stalin would approve of this proceeding.
How much more time does this guy get in questioning Karlan????
Will we get as much time?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.