Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

Nowhere in any of the posts I wrote on this topic did I even allude to the scenario you described. Such a scenario when the actual winning candidate concedes is exceedingly rare and when it occurs I’m sure the juristicional laws and regs would apply. I have said multiple times that concessions are PRECEDENT. If you and others can’t get that, oh well.


137 posted on 12/04/2019 10:29:04 AM PST by Avalon Memories (Politics is all about quid pro quos. Donate to me! Vote for me! I'll give you "free" stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Avalon Memories
I added that scenario in rebuttal. If you can't surmise how that would play out, then how can you be certain of the outcomes you suggest in your own scenario?

The scenario that you laid it is this:

If Bush had conceded, Gore would become President, not Cheney. Is that correct?

So, we follow that. If Bush had conceded, Florida would still have finished its recount and certified him. Yes or no?

If Bush conceded, does that mean that all counting still going on stops and the states all certify for Gore regardless of who won, or do they all still certify for the highest vote-getter?

So, you see that the scenario being discussed is implausible, because even if Bush were to concede, Gore would never have gotten to 270 Electoral College votes. Just being the last man standing doesn't make him President if he doesn't get 270 Electoral College votes.

If you and others can’t get that, oh well.

-PJ

138 posted on 12/04/2019 10:38:16 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson