Yes, but how was it not challenged?
How is Adam Shiff entitled to these records?
No worries. Bagpipe Bill is on the case, no doubt.
“How is Adam Shiff entitled to these records?”
That is my question also, and not even include the Republican minority on the same committee about the subpoenas?
Something is absolutely legally wrong about this situation. It is not a court of law or a trial, and a judge did not approve these subpoenas, and they are not a law enforcement agency which would have to still secure a warrant from a judge.
Maybe an administrative subpoena?
“An administrative subpoena is a compulsory request for documents — such as phone, Internet and other records — or testimony issued by an executive branch agency. Unlike traditional grand jury subpoenas, they do not require prior approval from a court or other judicial entity.
The recipient can file a motion in federal court to throw out the subpoena, but the standard for review is highly deferential to the government. Basically, the agency only has to show that the information sought is necessary for the performance of the agency’s official duties.”