Interesting explanation.
Basically women are more subject to behavioral politics, but not all of them, while men with feminine traits tend to also fall prey to behavioral argument as opposed to logical conscious argument about behaviors.
Predators of high IQ having both feminine and masculine traits will use behavioral weapons as well as logical cunning to plan and analyze situations outside the behavioral furball, analyzing behaviors themselves instead of relying on pitting his behavior over another in intuitive ways.
The nagging wife is basically a huntress whose game is her husband, using behavioral negociation strategies (tears of upset, vulnerable laughs of seduction etc.) to motivate the male to give a piece of himself. Of course, he thinks she is not after him, just after the food he can bring home, thinking she loves him, but his lack of leadership pack hunter mentality that only provides is what makes him easy prey and something seen as unreliable down the line, not a wolf pack leader to follow and respect but a bunny or piglet to pick the fat from.
Woman has a logicality within her needs to support her little ones and feed the next generation of great leaders, what not, all behavioral hunter-hunted bottom line based, not a “plain” man to man logic of organizing tasks in a tribe as a unit.