ANOTHER threat for investigating the Bidens? There must be some nasty stuff there..
zackly !
A Biden investigation exposes the widespread corrupt global scheme where politicians launder foreign aid back into personal accounts.
Everybody gets a cut including the MSM.
They are subsidized to lie through their teeth.
Lindsey would ruin their gravy train and put them in felonious criminal jeopardy.
They don’t want to pull on any threads that will unravel the web of corruption. Graham may in fact ‘regret it’ because who knows what will found down that rabbit hole.
There is plenty of information out there as it is, if you put a few dots together suggests a large scale money-laundering/public corruption/graft (whatever you want to call it) operation. Ukraine is probably one of the places precisely because it is so corrupt. And you have to ask if the place is so corrupt why is so much money dumped on it? And dumped in strange ways. If you lie with dogs you get fleas.
You have to wonder why did the State Department and George Soros pay to set up the NABU “anti-corruptions unit” inside Ukraine. They will say that it was to fight corruption but another reason they would do it is to control what gets investigated. George Kent, who testified in the Schiff hearing, was the man in charge of setting it up. Regular prosecutors in Ukraine claim that NABU did not answer to or report to them; some claim that the U.S. Embassy flat told them which people and things not to investigate. One says Ambassador Yovanavitch withheld $4 million because he refused to drop certain investigations. One says she withheld visas to visit the US when she learned they were coming to deliver evidence of campaign interference and public corruption - which had been sent to, and ignored by, the DOJ.
Then you have Joe Biden himself, who openly admits to bribing Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma. Burisma is owned by the former minister of interior who gave himself the permits to drill for gas and oil. That is obvious self-dealing corruption. He put several well connected Americans on his board including Hunter Biden and Hunter’s partner Archer shortly after President Obama appointed V.P. Biden as the point man on Ukraine. Hunter, Archer and Chris Heinz, the step-son of Sec of State John Kerry, were partners in many other ventures (though Heinz was said to have wisely rejected involvement in Burisma). When Burisma got raided by Ukrainian prosecutors, Burisma lobbies John Kerry to intervene. John Kerry and VP Biden are long time friends/associates serving decades together in the Senate. Archer eventually intervenes and gets a side down with Kerry, and then shortly after Biden flies off to Ukraine to get the prosecutor removed from the Burisma investigation.
This is all public knowledge, and reveals an enormous appearance of impropriety at the least. It is well worthy of investigation. But what would a thorough investigation reveal, what will it lead to?
We deserve to know the truth and let the chips fall where they may. Personally I think they fear more than just the fallout from discovering high level corruption - though that would be very bad for them. They fear the backlash that this will have on their entire modus operandi as a political party using government money to fund their political support - unions, government workers, grants, you name it. For example all of us taxpayers fund Planned Parenthood, but then Planned Parenthood spends money to campaign for Democrats. Oh sure they say their political money comes from separate donations but money is fungible. This same scheme goes on with the unions, teachers, sciences, arts, you name it. Sure the GOP does it too but the point is if we learn about the scope of corruption it may force a massive rethink of government in the future. That’s not good for the party that keeps wanting to expand government. It’s not good for the media that has been covering all this up.