To: Political Junkie Too
Not an attorney, but I’m quite sure that isn’t Constitutional either.
17 posted on
11/25/2019 2:16:20 PM PST by
Balding_Eagle
( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
To: Balding_Eagle
Driving isn't a right, it's a privilege regulated by the states.
I don't think it's unconstitutional if they don't single anyone out. The drivers still have their fourth amendment protections against illegal search and seizure, meaning the police cannot demand that drivers open their car doors or trunks for inspection without a warrant.
-PJ
25 posted on
11/25/2019 2:42:51 PM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: Balding_Eagle
Not an attorney, but I’m quite sure that isn’t Constitutional either. The Supreme Court has ruled that sobriety check points are constitutional. I am the first to admit that just because the Supreme Court rules that something is constitutional or not does not mean it is constitutional or not; however, it does become the law of the land.
31 posted on
11/25/2019 2:55:12 PM PST by
KevinB
("Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." - Charles Darwin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson