Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

Not an attorney, but I’m quite sure that isn’t Constitutional either.


17 posted on 11/25/2019 2:16:20 PM PST by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Balding_Eagle
Driving isn't a right, it's a privilege regulated by the states.

I don't think it's unconstitutional if they don't single anyone out. The drivers still have their fourth amendment protections against illegal search and seizure, meaning the police cannot demand that drivers open their car doors or trunks for inspection without a warrant.

-PJ

25 posted on 11/25/2019 2:42:51 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Balding_Eagle
Not an attorney, but I’m quite sure that isn’t Constitutional either.

The Supreme Court has ruled that sobriety check points are constitutional. I am the first to admit that just because the Supreme Court rules that something is constitutional or not does not mean it is constitutional or not; however, it does become the law of the land.

31 posted on 11/25/2019 2:55:12 PM PST by KevinB ("Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." - Charles Darwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson