The most glaring thing to me about the text is not even if the meeting took place, it’s that Judge Rudy Contreras wanted it, and suggested it not be one on one, but arranged at a social event (cover for action).
It was not just a push by Strzok toward Contreras, it was a pull. If one member of the FISC is an ideologically corrupt SJW using his black robe for camouflage, why should we assume there are not others?
The entire upper floors of CIA, FBI, DOJ etc are infested by SJWs, who use their power to promote their own up into power.
I went back and reread the texts of July 25, 2016. I think the text message "I did. We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him" refers to Mitch about CI training for the judicial branch.
Later in the text stream Strozk comments "Generally he does know what I do. Not the level or scope or area. But he's super thoughtful and rigorous about ethics and conflicts. M suggested a social setting with others would probably be better than a one on one meeting."
Strzok and Page definitely think the judge has a potential conflict of interest. I guess you can read this a bunch of different ways. Strzok and Page know more about the potential conflict than the judge. That is clear in the text messages. It looks like Strzok consults with M (Mitch) for advice since he is some sort judicial branch liaison. We would have to find out from Mitch why he gave Strzok that advice. My take is Mitch should have told Strzok to talk to an ethics officer.
We don't know the judges side of the story. He is still on the FISC court and hearing cases. If there is potential misconduct they will yank their cases until it is resolved.