[hinckley buzzard]

Shot in the back in a detached garage. Unless the guy was sleeping in his garage, its hard to find the self defense. Bad judgment. Very bad.

[FreedomNotSafety]

“Dayton police Chief Richard Biehl on multiple occasions has said a new state law shifts the burden of proof in self-defense cases from the defendant to the prosecutors, which could affect this case.

“The burden is on the state to prove this was not self-defense — it’s a high standard,” Biehl said.”

[Kickass Conservative]

It was a bad shoot, period.

I remember my Brother brandished his Carry Pistol once and the wannabe Perp turned around and ran. If he advanced in a threatening manner, the rules would have changed.

That is the best outcome for the potential Victim and the Perp. Even when the shoot is 100% justified, you end up taking a ride to the Police Station. To think otherwise is to make the false assumption that the Authorities support your Second Amendment Rights. They merely tolerate your Rights at best.

The two kids were stupid Punks, but that doesn’t give anyone the right to shoot them in the back.

Just my $.02, your mileage may vary.

[dangus]

>> Victor Santana <<

Uh-oh. “White Hispanic”?

[Georgia Girl 2]

Rut rho! Back shooting is no no.

[BradyLS]

Folks put their lives in someone else’s hands every time they trespass and root through other people’s property. Is it worth going to the morgue even if they know the property owner is going to jail?

[SuperLuminal]

Were I to sit on his jury, I'd vote only for awarding him a "good citizen" medal... If criminals invade your property and you just chase them away, they will, in 90% of such cases, be back with retribution in mind...