| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 11/22/2019 1:39:23 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Search still works |
Posted on 11/22/2019 12:55:28 PM PST by Louis Foxwell
Money for social justice and Muslim refugees, but not for the Salvation Army.
Fri Nov 22, 2019
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
Chick-fil-A’s announcement that it was dumping the Salvation Army and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, which have come under attack by gay activist groups, caught Christian fans of the fast food chain by surprise. It shouldn’t have if they had been paying attention to CFA’s corporate structure.
The donations were coming out of the Chick-fil-A Foundation. The Executive Director of the CFA Foundation is Rodney D. Bullard, a former White House fellow and Assistant US Attorney. Some may have mistaken him for a conservative because he was a fellow in the Bush Administration, but he was an Obama donor, and, more recently, had donated to Hillary Clinton’s campaign while at Chick-fil-A.
Like many corporations, Chick-fil-A branded its charitable giving as a form of social responsibility. Bullard became its Vice President of Corporate Social Responsibility. Unlike charity, corporate social responsibility is a leftist endeavor to transform corporations into the political arms of radical causes. Like other formerly conservative corporations, Chick-fil-A had made the fundamental error of adopting the language and the infrastructure of its leftist peers. And that made what happened entirely inevitable.
In an interview with Business Insider earlier this year, Bullard emphasized that the Chick-fil-A Foundation had a "higher calling than any political or cultural war." The foundation boss was preparing the way for the shakeup that was coming in the fall. Even while he claimed that the CFA Foundation had a higher calling than a political or cultural war, he was preparing to accommodate the Left’s cultural war.
Bullard would have been seen as a safe bet. The CFA Foundation and the Christian groups it supported were so entangled that Bullard serves on the Salvation Army’s National Advisory Board and was on the National Board of Trustees of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. But Bullard’s vision was not that of charity, but of corporate social responsibility. And the two things are fundamentally different.
Charity helps people. Corporate social responsibility is virtue signaling by capitalists to anti-capitalists. Unlike charity, corporate social responsibility isn’t about helping people, but ticking off ideological and identity politics boxes like diversity and the environment. If people accidentally get helped in the process of helping a corporation signal its membership in the politically correct creed, that can’t be helped.
The Chick-fil-A Foundation will go on funding leftist groups like Atlanta's Westside Future Fund. The Westside Future Fund is a project of the Atlanta Committee for Progress together with former Mayor Kasim Reed. It will just opt out of funding Christian groups whose views offend anyone on the Left.
The $1.7 million that the Westside Future Fund shoveled in last year from the CFA Foundation vastly outpaces the mere $115,000 that the Salvation Army got for its Angel Tree program to provide gifts for poor children during the holidays. But even that low end six figure donation was too much and the gifts had to be snatched away from the kids by leftist pressure groups and identity politics protesters.
Sorry kids, our politics are more important than your presents.
A less publicized donation of $100,000 went to Sustainable Atlanta. That could have bought a lot of gifts. There was also a $10,000 donation to Saris to Suits whose mission is to "advance women's empowerment, education, gender equality, and social justice."
There’s money for social justice, but not for the Salvation Army.
There was $25,000 for UNICEF and $75,000 for the Andrew Young Foundation. That last one isn’t a surprise. Carter’s radical UN ambassador sits on the CFA Foundation’s advisory board. $20,000 went to the Latino Leaders Network, another $20,000 to the Harvard Debate Diversity Network, $45,000 to the King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, and $5,000 was allotted to Friends of Refugees.
The latter boasts of resettling the sort of refugees who would demand that Chick-fil-A go Halal.
There’s money for Muslim refugees, but not for the Salvation Army.
And that’s the tip of the iceberg. “Diversity”, “equity”, and “social justice” are typical buzzwords associated with many of the organizations that the Chick-fil-A Foundation had been funding. And that’s typical of corporate social responsibility ventures which are all about pictures of smiling poor children cradling green plants accompanied by women in hijabs. There’s nothing unusual about that.
But most conservatives thought, without investigating, that Chick-fil-A was different. It wasn’t another corporate social behemoth. It didn’t answer to shareholders and stakeholders. It had a biblical vision. And, it was under fire for donating to Christian groups. But even when the CFA Foundation donated to Christian organizations, it was also pouring a lot of money into conventional social justice causes.
The controversy and arguments over the donations to organizations like the Salvation Army and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes conveniently distracted from where a lot of the money was going.
The Fellowship of Christian Athletes had received a mere $25,000 last year. Far less than the funds that poured into Andrew Young’s non-profit empire. A fig leaf.
Now the fig leaf is gone and the reality is that the Chick-fil-A Foundation is just another corporate leftist charity that lavishes cash on organizations linked to local Democrats and assorted diversity causes.
Without the fig leaf, the Chick-fil-A Foundation is no different than the other corporate charities run by their own equivalents of Bullard, men and women who had spent enough time in government to get a useless job in the corporate world, and its abandonment of Christian conservatives was an inevitability.
And the question is what will the Christians who made Chick-fil-A boom do now?
They can either fight to hold Chick-fil-A accountable or shrug and accept another loss. Most of the country’s major brands are pipelines of cash that lead directly to leftist causes. Hardly any of the money that conservatives spend on products and services every day ends up going to conservative causes.
Major brands hammer the air with ad campaigns that directly attack the values and rights of ordinary Americans. And, most Americans, including conservatives, keep on buying from the same huge conglomerates like Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Diageo (Johnny Walker), RBI (Burger King and Popeyes), General Mills, and from retailers like Walmart, Target, and Amazon, despite their leftist politics.
Chick-fil-A was supposed to be different. If there’s any company that conservatives can hold accountable, this is it. And if they can’t hold Chick-fil-A accountable, then what’s left?
Accountability doesn’t just begin with restoring donations to worthy charities like the Salvation Army, but a serious reevaluation of the Chick-fil-A Foundation’s leadership and its overall charitable priorities.
If Chick-fil-A wants to be in the business of corporate social responsibility, rather than charity, it will over time become increasingly hostile to the very customers who made it successful. Corporate social responsibility will take it down the same dark road of virtue signaling and political correctness.
Then, before you know it, there will be a Chick-fil-A ad campaign about toxic masculinity.
And then the legacy of its founder will be as thoroughly lost as the legacies of the founders of so many other great American companies whose modern incarnations slavishly serve anti-American causes.
That would be a tragedy. This is a test of whether that tragedy is truly inevitable.
It’s also a warning. If conservatives had paid closer attention to the Chick-fil-A Foundation’s leadership, Bullard’s $1,000 donation to Hillary Clinton in 2016 would have provided a warning of what was coming.
Organizations don’t trend rightward. They trend leftward. Any organization that isn’t closely watched will go the way of the Chick-fil-A Foundation. If this can happen at Chick-fil-A, it can happen anywhere.
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post. About Daniel Greenfield >Daniel Greenfield
Front Page mag - A Project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center
About Daniel Greenfield
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post or notify me by Freepmail.
Louis Foxwell...............................Daniel Greenfield Ping List Notification of new articles.
I am posting Greenfield’s articles from FrontPage and the Sultan Knish blog. FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Greenfield ping list.
I highly recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.
FrontPage is a basic resource for conservative thought. Lou
Bkmk
Sad.
I’ll miss their products.
But, purchasing ANYTHING from ANY COMPANY that supports progressives is tantamount to treason.
Period.
Already posted. Search is your friend:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=Obama%20Dumped%20christians
Christians should fight with their wallet. No longer visit their establishment and watch the bottom fall out of their earnings.
I guess you will have to retreat to your cave and blast the entrance closed.
Disgusting
This is the foundation, not the company. Kill Chic-fil-a and the progressives win.
I might gather a few kids and hold signs in front of my chick-fil-a.
I will never go to a Chic-Betray again. The sodomites will NEVER be satisfied with whatever the get from these jerks. They’ll probably demand that they hire 20% or 25% of sodomites or cross dressers from now on or they’ll picket the poor saps.
CHIC-BETRAY CAN GO TO HELL
I can't think of any other way. Be sure your dynamite (or your fertilizer) is supplied by some conservative entity with no connection to liberal causes.
Maybe eat at home more? I see my adult children spending money on things like Doordash and Grubhub and I just don’t get it. They make enough money to do so, but it just seems like a waste of resources. They also spend less than I do at the grocery store but I can see why, lol.
Most charitable foundations are ultimately captured by professional foundation and charity managers, all of whom are social activists. The Carnegie Foundation’s original purpose was building libraries across the United States. It built its last library in the 1950’s. Today it is involved in progressive social initiatives across the world. The professional managers changed the mission. The Ford and Rockefeller Foundations today are highly engaged in activities the industrialists who set them up would not support. These multimillion dollar, self perpetuating leftist organizations, which are funding the destruction of our culture and society, need to be made accountable. Here’s a suggestion.
1). End non-profit tax deductibility for foundations 20 years after date of incorporation.
2). Require foundations to fully distribute all funds, and liquidate, within 50 years of incorporation. Any funds remaining at the end of 50 years will be transferred into the treasury of the state in which the charity is incorporated and designated for paying down the public debt.
3). Require all non-profit foundations to have a very specific mission statement and designation as to where funds will be spent (i.e. building libraries in small towns across the USA). Forbid custodians of the funds from spending money on any activity not directly related to the mission.
4). Any foundation receiving funds from the federal government, state government, or foreign governments loses non-profit status immediately.
5) Any non-profit devoting funds to lobbying government at any level for any purpose immediately loses tax except status. Any non-profit organization involved in organizing activities to support candidates, political parties, or influence voters in any way will immediately lose non-profit status. This included voter registration efforts.
As of today I am boycotting CFA permanently and absolutely.
Two questions....
Who was responsible for appointing this Bullard?
When will they go vegan?
“This is the foundation, not the company. Kill Chic-fil-a and the progressives win.”
What are you talking about? They are intricately tied. The profits from chicken sandwiches go to fund the foundation’s now liberal projects.
The most important line in the article, “organizations don’t trend rightward, they trend leftward”. The Left is reshaping society. The silent coup.
Looks and sounds like Chick-Fil-A deliberately “pooped in their mess kit”. It will be interesting to see what happens long term from the fallout from this. I guess they can now be open on Sundays too? Why not? Once you “poop in your mess kit”, you can pee in it too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.