Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: usconservative

” I can understand the police getting involved, I do not understand where the school has the ability to suspend the perp in this case since the actions he took were OUTSIDE of school property and not on school time.

That part I don’t understand.”

Taken in the context of almost all schools nowadays require students to sign code of conduct pledges and behavioral pledges (again, most of which include items like cyber bullying of another student and other non-school property/hours related offenses), then it stands to reason these are the grounds on which the school has taken disciplinary action regarding this incident.

Agree or disagree, but that’s what I would think is going on in this instance.


69 posted on 11/22/2019 6:17:57 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The Left doesn't have ideas, it has cliches. H/T Flick Lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: jurroppi1
Thanks. I did not know that schools demand kids sign code of conduct pledges.

Frankly, that's stupid and lawsuits have proven they don't hold up in court. Schools in no way should ever have the ability to punish kids for what they do in their own time.

Schools exist for one purpose: education. Anything else is out of their purview.

71 posted on 11/22/2019 6:19:57 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson