To answer your questions:
1) It is long-settled law that the images are owned by the photographer that took the picture (copyright law). This is why you have to pay the photographer for your photograph.
2) No reasonable person (a standard in tort cases) could conclude that an ad on Craigslist highlighting a slave for sale would be valid marketing in the United States of America because slavery has been outlawed for over 150 years.
This is why liberals can no longer be considered reasonable. They do not notice these basic underpinnings of civil rights.
No reasonable person (a standard in tort cases) could conclude that an ad on Craigslist highlighting a slave for sale would be valid marketing in the United States of America because slavery has been outlawed for over 150 years.
How long has child prostitution been illegal?
What happens to people that post sexual service ads on Craigslist, especially if the picture in the ad is a child?