Can you summarize?
bmp
Beck lost me a long time ago. I’m not gonna give that kook any hits.
Another friggin video.
Sondland’s testimony was immediately reputed by 3 federal agencies. I expected Giuliani would refute his testimony too. Is that what happened?
My summary - this interview is worth listening to:
Rudy said he never brought up aid to Ukraine. He said Trump does this with every country concerning aid - he wants to make sure aid does not foster corruption.
Rudy said Trump was concerned about Ukrainian corruption, the same as any of us would be if we got briefings by the CIA regarding Ukraine corruption. Rudy said the briefing basically said everyone was corrupt according to our CIA and DOJ.
In November of 2018, prior to Biden running for President, a colleague called Rudy and said you won’t believe the corruption going on in the Ukraine where Ukrainians developed “information” to try and undermine the Trump campaign. It also involved strong evidence that the Steele dossier was developed in Kiev. There were real questions that the whole thing was a fraud created in the Ukraine. Manafort was targeted.
Rudy said as a defense attorney he got the information and acted on behalf of his client to go to the Ukraine to show that someone else actually committed the crime they were accusing his client of committing.
Rudy laughed at the idea that he was running a “shadow foreign policy.”
Part 1 was his investigation to gather exculpatory evidence on behalf of his client. This began during the Mueller investigation. Criticizes Weissman over the Manafort prosecution where he tried to bludgeon Manafort to say he was the link between corrupt Russians/Ukrainians and Trump. When he got the evidence that Joe Biden was involved in developing this so Rudy went there.
Rudy said people coming to investigate were BLOCKED by the U.S. Embassy. The person blocking has now gone to work for Soros (did not catch her name). George Kent set up the anti-corruption bureau and they took all the cases away from the Ukrainian government so they could prosecute “corruption” when they were really prosecuting enemies of Soros and protecting his friends.
Our ambassador requested they tank a case that might have revealed the corrupt relations.
Will not say if he knows the name of the whistleblower, but he does and refers to him as the anonymous informant. Is hesitant to comment on it. He is convinced this whole episode is one chapter of a multi-chapter plan to remove the President.
The black ledger against Manafort was delivered to the NY Slimes as part of the pre-election plan to damage Trump. Glenn brings up the fact that the ledger was never used against Manafort because it is a fraud. It was never used in the prosecution of Manafort because it was a lie. Names a rogue FBI agent who now works for Soros who developed the ledger because they needed the ledger to open the case against Manafort (sounds familiar doesn’t it? Steele dossier).
The ledger did not work against Trump so they used it to target Manafort. The Ukrainians who provided the ledger were convicted in a Ukrainian court.
There are several prosecutors in Kiev who want to come to the U.S. and testify but our state department is not giving them VISA’s so that they can come.
For 3-4 years our embassy has interfered in this story by refusing VISA’s to Ukrainian officials who are more than willing to testify about the bribery and collusion. The case in Ukraine is a massive “pay to play” scheme. Rudy is going to give Glenn Beck the names and Glenn said he will go there and interview them.
[snip]"Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found."