Since “nobody” knows who the supposed whistle blower is, I think the Republicans should subpoena Eric Ciaramella by name, for his supposed Ukraine expertise. If Schi**y Schift supposedly doesn’t know who the whistle blower is, how’s he going to explain objecting???
They already refused to contact name today because it could compromise the whistleblower’s identity even though they claim they don’t know who the whistleblower is.
So can they (citing ignorance) claim to refuse ALL questions about other people since “anyone” could be the whistleblower?
This is contempt. They aren’t even citing the 5th amendment.