Posted on 11/20/2019 10:09:07 AM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
You should try to get on the DNC fax list.
The talking points were defined a head of, and regardless of, the “testimony”.
Re Wallace : YAWN
Did Chris see Trump’s reenactment of Sondland’s testimony ,LOL
Sondland’s version will not hold up. Perhaps McConnell and graham are going to be disappointed but I think that unless they all succeed in turning a majority of Trump supporters they’re stuck with declining impeachment in the senate
Sondland was pretty good for a last ditch effort. But he will be as forgotten as mueller by monday
Hey Rupert, your boys are ruining the Fox News empire that took you years to construct by turning it into a lying liberal democrat propaganda club. I won’t be surprised when your FN truthers leave and your sons fill their slots with more liars like Chris Wallace. When that happens, CNN might make you an offer to takeover FN.
“Ken Starr is already walking back on his previous statement earlier today”
Really? What’s he saying now???
Not sure why he’s headed back to Brussels. He should have been told his services were no longer required weeks ago.
We saw much of that very same hatred when Bush was in the WH. Yes, with Trump, it’s gone to 11, but it’s always been there, even back to Reagan’s time, remember the Iran-Contra Hearings?
Who cares about Ken Starr? Guy has failed at everything he ever did.
Never Trumper?
Is that why he gave the inauguration a million dollars?
https://www.oregonlive.com/news/erry-2018/07/cdbfd3400b3583/portland-hotelier-who-gave-1-m.html
Sondland basically just said he didn’t like policy.
“Ran a bus ..” lol .
Stated opinion. Should have quit.
“Ken Starr is already walking back on his previous statement earlier today”
Really? What’s he saying now???
He did not have Sex with Bill Clinton ?
He said the opening statement was totally different than what he’s saying now and Sondland should have mentioned in his opening that President Trump did NOT want a Quid Pro Quo and wanted NOTHING from Ukraine except for them to do their job..he said that would have made a big difference..but we all know who wrote the opening, and it was Schiff..that is why you hear the ENTIRE testimony before making judgement
Yes, that is why the Dems ‘pivoted’ for the umpteenth time away from ‘quid pro quo’ to ‘BRIBERY’ because their minions are too ignorant to understand what that is.
And even if there was a QPQ, it’s not illegal......................
No, he read the summary of what Sondland was going to say that was put out by Democrats last night.
The Democrats put this out so the media would know what narrative to use before Sondland testifies.
Of course, it does not reflect what Sondland actually said....but that would derail the narrative.
So that is what Sondland looks like. I’m where there is no TV. He looks like a squid. Trump would be better off hiring a guy like me. I can’t,no wait,won’t believe that he didn’t know the connection between Biden and Burisma. He’s a liar and traitor.
That Baylor Football players didn't have sex with coeds?
Schiff For Brains is Terrible Judge , IMPEACH HIM
Sondland’s testimony will not age well.
He came out with a bang!!! Quid Pro Quo was known and CLEARLY understood. Giuliani said it and the VP was told about it. Sore, he said something different before but now Sondland’s testimony changed based on his review of his calendars and notes.
That was all smirking, fake glasses Chris Wallace needed to hear.
But: he missed:
Trump releases a letter from himself to Ukraine President with no mention of any conditions.
Trump releases the back and forth between himself and Sondland saying no quid pro quo.
Then, Giuliani denies speaking directly with Sondland other than over the phone with others on the line and never mentioned the Bidens.
Then, Sondland admits never speaking with the President about the Bidens or Burisma. He admits, like every other witness to hearing of it from someone who heard from someone.
Then, VP Pence releases a statement saying he never spoke with Sondland or was alone with him on the trip where Sondland claims he had the conversation with Pence.
Then someone asks Sondland: “if it was so understood that there was a quid pro quo, why did you need to review notes to modify your testimony. I mean, it was so understood?”
Then Sondland answers: “ if come to realize it now.”
In short, this guy was no more than the rest of the witnesses, offering testimony that would be inadmissible in a court of law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.