Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HotHunt

The IG can’t reveal his name. But there’s nothing in the statute that grants anonymity forever. The law protects you from retribution and retaliation from your superiors. And I don’t think the IG can add “anonymity” to the law, as the law is passed by Congress. Ciaramella may get through the House proceedings without having to talk, but, if Graham is true to his word that won’t play in the Senate. At this point, no one can corroborate anything, especially these first 5 morons. Only one of whom says she was in the room but has since changed her story as to what she heard.

Just take the vote, along party lines, impeach him and let it go to the Senate where it’s a different set of rules and he can defend himself.


61 posted on 11/19/2019 12:34:06 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: qaz123
Schitt-For-Brains has so tightly controlled this impeachment sham that he thinks he can fool the American people. No one is fooled for a minute.

But he is so bitter he couldn't find or expose all of the "evidence" he claimed he had on Trump's Russian collusion, that he has really jumped the shark this go around.

This impeachment circus is nothing more than a mini-version of Mueller Part Deux without the Special Counsel.

Yeah, that'll work.

First off, everybody but Schitt himself knows the identity of the anonymous WB. He knows but is playing a game like he can't and won't reveal it. He's making an ass of himself.

Yeah, that strategy is failing.

And two, every "witness" he has had so far, including the WB he won't reveal, don't have direct evidence of the phone call. They all have their opinions of what happened or they heard from someone who said they knew someone who claims they heard the call.

Yeah, that's convincing.

I even read that one of his "witnesses" admitted what he had "heard", he had actually read about it in the NYSlimes.

Yeah, that's evidence.

His witnesses are all anti-Trump democRATS who want to get rid of Trump as bad as Schitt-For-Brains does. These diplomats think they run foreign policy instead of the president. They're supposed to implement his policy, not tell Congress he's not doing what they want to do in the Ukraine.

In the end, this will probably result in some bogus impeachment articles. But that's not a certainty. The longer it goes on and the more flimsy it gets, some democRATS might bail in Schitt and Pelosi.

But I have no doubt this clown show will be stopped in the Senate. Trump is becoming more popular the longer this goes on. He will win reelection going away in 2020.

93 posted on 11/19/2019 4:20:23 PM PST by HotHunt (Been there. Done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson