Which is what the National Academies means by "cannabis."
You listed some things that MAY be helpful in a medical sense
False - "conclusive or substantial evidence" is much more than "may."
for each one of those there are MUCH more effective drugs available
Medicine is not a one-size-fits-all area - which is why for may medical conditions there are multiple medications.
which is WHY pharmaceuticals don't really focus on this garbage.
No, pharma doesn't focus on cannabis because it's not patentable.
And yet here we are, every day, having to read about how healthy it is to smoke pot. Keep up the propaganda.
Wrong yet again - medically useful is not necessarily "healthy." Nobody would say that the recreational use of chemotherapy drugs was "healthy."
Smoked pot good for relieving pain!!!! What a miracle. You know what's more effective?? Whiskey!
Smoked pot good for increasing appetite! Wow. You know what's better then that? Healthy eating and exercise!
The "health" benefits here are absolutely laughable and absurdly oversold. The propaganda you're spewing is ONLY there BECAUSE the left wants legal pot so they can get America stoned. When enough people are stoned they're more easily influenced and more docile.
MORE propaganda. With this argument just ONE anecdotal story about smoking pot helping anything is (to the left) a justification for letting everyone smoke pot.