Posted on 11/16/2019 11:03:41 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Does this judge support the prosecution of voter fraud?
Obama - who else but an Obama judge would involve the court in blatantly political decisions at this level. I’m appalled at the level of corruption of the mind and the law his appointees have have carried with them..
This should have been done in the state court but the socialist, corrupt party know they would lose since the Supreme court of the state is a conservative w=one and they would lose
Why doesnt the GOP fight like this?
You know, people often ask that question.....
How come Myth doesn't have any balls?
Why is Mitch such a Turtle?
How come McCain only fights against Republicans?
Why is Cantor such a spineless weasel?
Oh, Trump shouldn't say mean things and fight people on Twitter.
The electorate clamors for a fighter, but rewards the nutless among us.
2010 saw the largest gathering of Conservatives and swept the Tea Party into Congress.....where they diddled along and sold us out - albeit at a slower pace than the socialists. The sent a multitude of worthless bills they knew would never get signed.
The moment Trump was inaugurated was the last time any half decent bill made it to the White House.
We fight and wind up with the same political class of losers. Regan and Trump are anomalies......and still - He shouldn't say mean things about the Soviets. He shouldn't say mean things on Twitter......
Not a big deal...IMHO
Someone has to be first. Why are the rats first?
“This should have been done in the state court but...”
This is when the GOP needs strategic thinking and tactical action. Since the demokraps made this a federal issue ... and it went against the GOP, the GOP needs to file suits in all blue** states where demokraps are listed first on every ballot. Of course the GOP should lose those suits at district court b/c the demokrap federal judge will decide against them. But it will eventually make it to the super-legislature US Supreme Court, and whatever comes out there will apply to states where one party is in control.
There are other issues the GOP would follow a similar strategy. The demokraps are short sighted, and you have to box them in. But hope is not lost because of Trump who likes to fight. It is spilling over to some other GOP members, like some of the House GOP who sit on Schiff’s secret impeachment hoax committee. Also, when Senator Turtle took the reins from Harry “Black Eye” Reid, he used the “no filibuster rule” against the howling demokraps for Trump’s judicial appointees. None of this happened during W’s tenure.
** - really communist red belongs to the demokraps by history and tradition, but that’s for another time.
How about a law that only provides the names of the candidates only and not the party?
That would really shake things up.
McConnell and Graham need to get Trump’s judicial appointments confirmed ASAP.
The previous occupant of the White House. The bias that these Leftist judges show is getting unbearable.
Trump
Warren
It seems Trump would still be listed first
Are the Democrats going to raise the same fight in New York, on principle?
(Heh. "Principle." That word's not in the Progressive glossary.)
We may have the uneducated vote, but they clearly have the illiterate vote.
The idea that the US Constitution controls the order of candidates on a state election ballot is insane.
What does it mean to be a “Republican”? The Uniparty always looks after its own.
This seems odd to me. Where I vote we go in the door and report to the official at the desk. She asks:”Democrat or Republican?” They give us a stylus and brings up the form on the computer for the party of choice. If you answer both, you will get a combined form. They also check the voter rolls for your name/address. There are print outs kept in the courthouse someplace.
Freedom comes before Socialist.
It probably isn't, but elections are a state function, unless they try to change a constitution requirement for the office. I hope the State fights this, if the need to be addressed it should be the state supreme court. This is an over reach by a federal court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.