To: LibertyWoman
I'm not saying that Bolton ISN'T the leaker. I am just exercising cautious skepticism. If Bolton started calling journalists and demonicRATS (but I repeat myself) right after President Trump fired him, why did they hold on to that information until now?
If they are suggesting Bolton gave the "go" signal for the coup, then they are implicating themselves if part of the coup strategy was to hold on to that particular piece of information until after the Schiff Show started.
42 posted on
11/16/2019 8:46:52 AM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would be have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Texas Eagle
Skepticism is good. To this point everything about the 'whistleblower' (LEAKER) is speculation. I have questions about the entire fake situation. 'Who' is the main question.
It's like the vile 'dossier'. It just floated to the top of the cesspool after months of composing by embedded traitors i.e. McCain, Clinton, Obama... all of whom had a hand in that pos situation.
The article was printed in September, shortly after Bolton was fired.
To: Texas Eagle; LibertyWoman
What you said, Texas E. Plus, the coup started several years ago, so if Bolton is doing the bad things the anonymous sources say in the article, he better stand at the end of the link. And those in the front of the line are going to be receiving justice soon, and it won’t be pretty, and I’m sure Bolton knows that.
87 posted on
11/16/2019 10:39:18 AM PST by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
To: Texas Eagle
Article was dated September 26 2019
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson