Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JayGalt

Next up would be to make the “mark to market” tax retroactive to the date of purchase


61 posted on 11/15/2019 12:40:35 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Ouderkirk
Next up would be to make the “mark to market” tax retroactive to the date of purchase

It inherently is. It would be your basis at the end of the year, less the last basis you'd already reported. Yes, they could make it year to year.

Most likely, they would take the commodities market as a model. It hasn't been mentioned in the comments so far, but futures (i.e., the commodities market) are marked to market at the end of the year right now, and taxed at a blended rate that is 60% capital gains and 40% ordinary. It has to do with the fact that its easy to roll over contracts.

Anyway, I think the first focus would be financial assets. Of course, the next "tax expenditure" would be seen to be real estate appreciation. Imagine the corruption and bribes that would be associated with the assessor's valuation!

66 posted on 11/15/2019 12:47:51 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

Exactly, so they get a good first bite at the apple.


70 posted on 11/15/2019 1:02:15 PM PST by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson