Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The article later mentions that for 1.5 million household (the "evil" 1%), investment income would be subject to a 39.6% income tax rate, the current 3.8% Obamacare investment income tax, and a new 14.8% Social Security investment income tax, which adds up to 58.2%. On top of this would be any state and local income taxes.
1 posted on 11/15/2019 5:30:43 AM PST by karpov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: karpov

That’s insane...you can only have 100% of anything


2 posted on 11/15/2019 5:32:17 AM PST by The Louiswu (MAGAa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

I am of the opinion that the US ... if we continue to maintain an income tax ... must establish a minimum and maximum tax rate.


3 posted on 11/15/2019 5:32:59 AM PST by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

This Rat Bitch is totally out of her mind.....why invest...why work....why live???


4 posted on 11/15/2019 5:33:31 AM PST by mastertex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

What a genius


7 posted on 11/15/2019 5:36:02 AM PST by yldstrk (Bingo! We have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

A 100% net tax relative to income is easy to see without a lot of numbers.

Suppose one is subject to the 6% wealth tax, but invests conservatively in 5% rate tax exempt municipal bonds.

On $1000, the income would be $50; the confiscation would be $60. Presto: 120% tax rate.

But, that mixes the penalty on principal, which is confiscatory, with the penalty on income, which is just “tax”.


9 posted on 11/15/2019 5:38:41 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

SPJNK.


10 posted on 11/15/2019 5:38:45 AM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov
THey don't understand the law of diminishing returns, and if the potential reward isn't worth the risk, or if the payout isn't worth the time and effort to be put in, then it won't happen.

The only upside would be how many Hollywood celebrities only do movies every other year and film them all between December and January to split up their incomes. Even after that, they'd probably lose 90% of their royalty checks if they worked on anything else.

(If I have the anecdote correct, Reagan turned down a role in a movie once because he'd only get to keep about 10 cents on the dollar for what they were willing to pay him. He might've been telling that story about another actor though. I don't remember the whole thing.)

11 posted on 11/15/2019 5:39:02 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Won’t happen, but boy would it cause a stir if the response from one of the “rich” Warren blather about would be the same as the response as the Mel Gibson character in the movie “Ransom”.


13 posted on 11/15/2019 5:40:35 AM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov
Plus, his entire investment would incur a 6% wealth tax, i.e., at least $60.

Huh? I thought it was 2 cents?

14 posted on 11/15/2019 5:42:56 AM PST by Religion and Politics (It is time for more than one denomination of "Political Correctness".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

A lot of money would be moved overseas.


15 posted on 11/15/2019 5:45:21 AM PST by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

The Romans, in the 2nd and 3d century AD, when faced with confiscatory taxes solved the problem by getting a new emperor. The process was usually quick and efficient but hard on members of the outgoing regime.


17 posted on 11/15/2019 5:47:29 AM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

If this comes to pass, there will be a tsunami of capital flowing out of the US. Some enterprising nations will declare amnesty for rich people and have to power to make Fauxcahantas think twice about flexing her muscle. Too bad Russia has lousy weather.


18 posted on 11/15/2019 5:48:08 AM PST by beef (Caution: Potential Sarcasm - Process Accordingly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Sounds like sharia law to me!


19 posted on 11/15/2019 5:48:18 AM PST by rawcatslyentist ("All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Watch $2.5T disappear from the common investment markets overnight.

There is much of enduring value to own which cannot be easily assessed & taxed.
The rich are rich because they know how to acquire & retain wealth, regardless of assaults thereon.


20 posted on 11/15/2019 5:51:22 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Specialization is for insects.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Congress needed a Constitutional amendment to tax individual income.
That did not permit tax of holdings.
Warren’s proposal is unconstitutional; odds of getting such passed is nil.


21 posted on 11/15/2019 5:53:07 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Specialization is for insects.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

"Tax 'em at 200%! That'll bring in more revenue!"


22 posted on 11/15/2019 5:53:32 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Hillary Clinton: Just like Joe with only half the dementia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Elizabeth Warren has done the impossible with her tax plans.

She has made impeachment look like a reasonable way to move Donald Trump out of the White House.


24 posted on 11/15/2019 5:57:53 AM PST by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Not just federal! There are state and city taxes! Those taxes are figured on your gross. They don’t care if you have NOTHING left from your gross.

And stop calling it a wealth tax! It’s confiscation! Just like the property “tax” which is incremental confiscation of your house.


31 posted on 11/15/2019 6:05:30 AM PST by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Nobody will pay a tax rate of one hundred percent.


32 posted on 11/15/2019 6:05:48 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham ("God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Well at least people are seeing it in black and white now, thanks to Trump.

The democrats want 100% of everyone’s wealth. Always have always will.


44 posted on 11/15/2019 6:57:00 AM PST by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson