Exactly what does J-O Joe have against the magazine Clips?
Posted on 11/12/2019 3:07:09 PM PST by rktman
I think that Plugs needs to have a few more hair plugs inserted into his noggin. I have a nice new ball peen hammer handy.
Perfecto.
He escaped from his nursing home bed....again!
Thats correct. The maximum number of legal clips allowed in a magazine correlates to the barrel length diameter divided by the chamber width times pie R squared. That actually makes more sense the what crazy Joe said.
CREEPY joe.
Imagine what is NOT on film of this creep.
Wrong, wrong...Pie R NOT square, pie R round...Cake R square...
I don’t but I bet it is scary looking.
Unless it is a Pop Tart, chewed into a gun shape, with 100 cherry pit capacity..
Thanks for keeping track of these threads. It took me twenty minutes to load my magazine with 100 clips.
I actually agree with him on this. Way too much jam potential.
funny, i looked but couldn’t fine any 100-clip limit on what we may own, in the US Constitution
Joe, what clause is it?
I think Joe would explain you could find it below decks here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Constitution
;-)
It appears next to the right to on demand abortions up to 21 years post partum.
Joe Biden doesn’t tell me what I can own.
I fully support a Federal law that bans the sale, manufacture, and possession of a magazine that holds 100 clips.
‘Only Military Can Own A Magazine With A Hundred Clips In It’ Says Slow Joe
Really good stuff. Loved all the media backing him up.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.