This is what I can't figure out. Didn't the Court already rule DACA was unconstitutional as an EO?
And, if so, how can it be argued that it is unConstitutional to end an unConstitutional program?
It seems to me that there is only one remedy for those who want DACA to continue... and that is for Congress to act and for the President to sign.
Just because that path is unlikely... that doesn't mean that any other alternative will do.
SCOTUS rules that DAPA - the same program, but for the parents - was unconstitutional.
DACA has never been tested for constitutionality at SCOTUS.