Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox legal analyst claims alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella could be 'implicated' in FISA report
washington examiner ^ | 11/6/2019 | daniel Chaitin

Posted on 11/08/2019 8:24:27 PM PST by bitt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: bitt; Fred Nerks

THE ESPIONAGE RING IS NOW BEING REVEALED.

The crux of the matter is a linkage between Caramiella, the Steele report and the actual workings of the espionage group
to subvert the FISA court, the use of domestic federal agencies supported by international intelligence agencies, using international security agreements ( MI5/MI6 in Great Britain) to create espionage of a duly elected president of the United States.

This is not mere political activity, but subversive espionage dedicated to thwarting the electoral will of the People.

It is criminal activity which included the placement of Hunter Biden to be one of the bagmen of the ring for the funds obtained through both extortion and influence peddling, racketeering.

This is a RICO offense and espionage.

Is Deputy AG Durham up to the task?

We shall see.
***********************************

Reference:

***********************************

Espionage , its very clear, and just simple:

United States Supreme Court

SCHENCK v. U.S.(1919)
No. 437
Argued: Decided: March 3, 1919

We admit that in many places and in ordinary times the defendants in saying all that was said in the circular would have been within their constitutional rights. But the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. Aikens v. Wisconsin, 195 U.S. 194, 205 , 206 S., 25 Sup. Ct. 3. The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. It does not even protect a man from an injunction against uttering words that may have all the effect of force. Gompers v. Buck’s Stove & Range Co., 221 U.S. 418, 439 , 31 S. Sup. Ct. 492, 55 L. ed. 797, 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 874. The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.


41 posted on 11/09/2019 8:01:27 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obam_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artcore

We have been told the proper time is going to be Spring of 2019.....................oh, wait..............


42 posted on 11/09/2019 8:55:20 AM PST by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Wonder if Schiff is going to coe out with a book
How To Lead People Into a Minefield


43 posted on 11/09/2019 9:28:00 AM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Same stable of players


44 posted on 11/09/2019 12:51:37 PM PST by onyx (#StandWithICE. - #KAG a#TRUMP2020Landslide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson