Replies

Honestly, while I heard guys talk like that 20 years ago, I have not heard anything like that lately. It really is disgusting. But back a while, men could get clinical and gross in their discussions of women as f objects only.

I didn’t hear the misogyny in it when I was young because I did think “men talk like that” but thank goodness the next generations don’t have that animosity and objectifying in their tones when they talk about what they have done or wish they could do. It really has changed at least in the middle class non hood milieu.

There is a difference between typical locker room banter and talking about all women as if they exist as your sex slaves only. If you can’t hear the difference, you might need to check your own attitude. Every woman you have sex with at least deserves you to consider her as human as you.

[There is a difference between typical locker room banter and talking about all women as if they exist as your sex slaves only. If you can’t hear the difference, you might need to check your own attitude. Every woman you have sex with at least deserves you to consider her as human as you.]

I’m not sure where you draw the inference that talking about a woman’s physical attributes implies women are prostitutes. It’s no different from talking about how someone is smart, quick or clumsy. I know a number of successful, monogamous and not particularly sexually adventurous types who do this as a kind of humorous parody.

The litigious harpy who sued Bloomberg has been out of work for 4 years. It would not surprise me if nobody wants to hire her because of concerns about what innocent banter might be deliberately misconstrued for the purposes of generating a big legal settlement. I find it amusing that Andrea Dworkin’s view of male-female interactions has become the conventional wisdom even among some female Freepers.