Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edwinland
The true lesson is that the author's candidate deserved to win the race for the office that he was entitled to hold, but then he lost, and now the author is mad at the voters because it's all their fault.

The voters are the boss, and they get the final word. I suspect they chose poorly. They (and everyone who supported Bevin) get to live with the results.

I think it's empty virtue signaling from those who don't think very hard about their vote or government.

41 posted on 11/07/2019 1:02:01 PM PST by gogeo (The left prides themselves on being tolerant, but they can't even be civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: gogeo

That’s true - sort of like choosing a surgeon - an obnoxious jerk who is an excellent surgeon or a nice guy but is a butcher. But electoral politics can be as much - or more - about personalities rather than policies. Given that reality, Bevin also had an obligation to choose words more carefully out of respect for his own policies and what they represented in order to be able to get re-elected and continue that work instead of having it reversed. He doesn’t say those outrageous things, his personal popularity would not have tanked and he would have enjoyed a 55-60% margin of victory like all of the other candidates as it would have been solely about issues and not so much about personality - because on the issues, Beshear stank...that’s why the race was even close instead of Bevin losing by 15 or more points...a lot of people did in fact vote on issues, but personality simply overpowered that narrative.


43 posted on 11/07/2019 7:52:28 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson