[jazusamo]

Another excellent piece by Gregg Jarrett, he lays this out legally and with common sense.

[euram]

We have to stop referring to him as a “whistleblower” he’s a “leaker, democrat operative, and spy”.

[RatRipper]

How is this so-called whisleblower different to the Watergate plumbers????

[goldstategop]

Eric Ciamarella. The name the Democrat media dare not mention.

[jazusamo]

MAGA!

Let’s Wrap This FReepathon Up Early, Folks…Donate Today!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

[jdsteel]

“ He or she must first qualify for whistleblower status under the governing law. Yet, in the present case, he does not.”

Pretend whistleblower for a pretend impeachment.

[miserare]

TY, Gregg Jarrett.

[TChad]

But it is incomprehensible why most of the media have failed to expose the hoax.

I think Jarrett meant to say "obvious" instead of "incomprehensible."

[qaz123]

He’s an informant acting as a Democratic operative.......

Isn’t it pretty much the rule that if the President of the United States is engaged with a foreign leader, unless at a public event, that that engagement would be considered CLASSIFIED? If so, then he leaked classified information. Of which he didn’t even have firsthand knowledge of.

They arrested Julian Assange for doing the same exact thing, when it comes down to it. The content of the information is irrelevant.

Julian Assange got information from another party and put it out there.

Ciaramella got information from another party and put it out there.