Posted on 11/06/2019 8:44:07 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Thank you again, that was also very interesting.
They are competing religions.
Was this a same-sex relationship or a same-sex marriage?
Theres a reason that Lev 20:13 prescribes death for homosexual acts, and God says several times the land will spew you out for allowing such. Homosexuals will never accept live and let live. They lie. Ask Lot.
Yep.
From my view, way out here in the bleacher seats, it has already happened!
That’s kinda what they want to do. Actually, it’s destroying Christianity so there is no one reminding them that their actions are perverted.
Is California, of all places, the only state where abridgment of constitutionally enumerated rights by misguided state actors was appropriately dealt with in the context of the 14th Amendment (14A) even though taxpayers, not offending state actors, probably payed the settlement?
From the 14th Amendment:
"Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
H O W E V E R
There is evidence that Christians are indirectly hindering federal lawmakers from making 14A-based laws to strengthen freedom of religious expression.
More specifically, if you Google reasons that Christians dont vote you will probably get many links. These links are evidence that Christians are not using their G-d-given voting power to either elect, or keep in office, federal lawmakers who might otherwise be willing to exercise Congresss 14A power to make laws that discourage anti-Christian activist state actors from abridging freedoms of religious expression and speech.
In other words, Christians have arguably put themselves in a situation where they are giving anti-Christian judges an excuse to legislate anti-Christian laws from the bench because Christians are not supporting with their votes federal lawmakers who might otherwise be willing to make protective laws for judges to enforce.
In fact, patriots who value their constitutionally enumerated protections of freedom of religious expression and free speech consider that Acts 22:25-29 shows that Apostle Paul got out of a flogging by claiming his Roman citizenship.
Insights welcome.
Remember in November 2020!
MAGA! Now KAG! (Keep America Great!)
Probably correct but they need big gov to maintain
Depends on who is in charge of the FedGov. As sad as that is.
The gay couples who went after the Christian bakers and wedding photographers could have gone elsewhere. They chose not to. They SPECIFICALLY sought out people who did not agree with the LGBT agenda.
To the Left, there is no concept of mutually-respectable differences of opinion. There is only “right think” and “wrong think”. They consider anyone who does not agree with them to be monstrously evil, to be hunted down, silenced and destroyed.
The Left, and LGBT+ lobby will not compromise. They are on a jihad to eliminate “wrong think”.
It already has.
My kids And tgeir friends All call each other
gay and faggot all the time as an insult
so as long as that keeps happening I think were good
They know never ever ever ever ever to even think about doing that at school though !!or they would get 1 million year suspension
Look heres my two cents
You go ahead and PEt whoever you want ! lick whoever you want ! have sex with whoever you want !
we just dont want to hear about it OK?
Nobody wants to hear about you and what goes on between your legs
Put simply , the aggressive legal homosexual aspect is merely a bold attack on Christianity and the Bible. And those who believe. Nothing more
Whats very important to protect and is very constitutional is :
freedom of speech
freedom of thought and written word
freedom of conscience
and freedom of religion
Ill add freedom of movement
We will see there are those opposed to these and they must be countered
the line is only crossed when you try to dictate to others how you want them to be and then try to use force to exert your point of view ON THEM
I’ve started using 3P as a pronoun: Preferred personal pronoun.
Oy! You’re right!
Since the homosexual/racial rights platform is based upon the (specious) premise that they are genetically oriented toward same-sex attraction and thus should be protected from discrimination, which causes them harm, then born again Christian should be able to claim that they are spiritually oriented against same-sex attraction, and being forced to support it causes them harm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.