Question Mr Davidson: wouldn’t you say that partisan FBI perjury traps are against due process?
Court decisions have favored the government regarding them lying to you during an interview or investigation. That said, once you fore arm someone with “this is not an investigation†you have completely voided that defense of what you do IMO. Someone lies to your face when you possess info that is different from what you know, should be followed with a direct question about it like: information available to us shows that is not the case. IOW, unless as the FBI did here, trying to trap someone into a nebulous lie, they should have braced him with the opportunity to explain his answer. If Flynn continued to “lie” they should have given him his rights as to go further would be wrong as they have gone from exploration to evidence gathering. So, how they proceeded in this matter shows it was a counter intel political inspired investigation using Flynn as a potential stepping stone. When we have our secret state testing candidates for their Fidelity, we are in a bizzaro world of whom is actually electing a representative. Furthermore, there is only one person in all of the executive branch who could have condoned this outrage. He is living in a mansion by the sea in Massachusetts.