Skip to comments.
Chris Wallace: As impeachment vote was cast, 'I can feel goosebumps'
The Hill ^
| October 31, 2019
| Joe Concha
Posted on 10/31/2019 1:46:07 PM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-162 next last
To: jazusamo
R.I.P., Journalism...
141
posted on
10/31/2019 5:24:51 PM PDT
by
4Liberty
(The taxpayers can always take one more for the team. - The Government)
To: jazusamo
Let me guess Pissy Chrissy; you got tingles up your leg too.
What a maroon!
142
posted on
10/31/2019 5:27:23 PM PDT
by
Boomer
(Our melting pot has turned into a pressure cooker)
To: goldstategop
No, but they did vote to formally investigate impeachment, which means they’re going all in before long. They want to build it up so their case has a solid narrative once they move it to the Judiciary Committee. The longer they can play it out in the media, the greater the probability Mitt can start peeling off GOP senators to support it.
Comment #144 Removed by Moderator
To: jazusamo
"What will be interesting to see is what happens when we have open hearings and the American people get to judge and conceivable to put pressure on their representatives and either, 'Yep, theres a case against the president' or 'Nope, there isn't.' But the Democrats have cast their die now and this is going to roll out over the next two months," Wallace concluded. I would advise Chris Wallace to go long kevlar futures.
145
posted on
10/31/2019 6:06:55 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(The Media & the DNC tells you who you're gonna vote for. We CHOSE Trump.)
To: jazusamo
146
posted on
10/31/2019 6:29:35 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: piasa
Exactly!
I can hear it now, no president under impeachment should be allowed to advance ANY Supreme Court justice.
Our betters will all nod in agreement as they stonewall any nomination under the guise of doing what is right for the country.....
147
posted on
10/31/2019 8:02:00 PM PDT
by
Bshaw
(A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
To: smvoice
“In what the hell kind of BIZARRO world do we live that Fox News can LOSE Katherine Herridge and GAIN Chris Wallace??”
I can answer that question! A world where Paul Ryan joins the board at Fox.
Their goal is to control EVERY communication channel available to conservatives.
Doing a decent job of it too...
148
posted on
10/31/2019 8:14:18 PM PDT
by
Bshaw
(A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
To: Sarah Barracuda
I didn’t know Catherine Herridge left. What a shame. She’s a fantastic investigator.
149
posted on
11/01/2019 11:52:30 AM PDT
by
janlou85
(doesn'tsufferfoolsglady)
To: goldstategop
He didnt. Read the article. I actually watched him say this live. He never said they voted to impeach PDJT. He said exactly what the article said-that they voted for an impeachment inquiry - which is exactly what they did in 1973 - except it was bipartisan back then-which is also what he said.
150
posted on
11/01/2019 11:57:30 AM PDT
by
NELSON111
(Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog s<how. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
To: TexasGator
You claim an ability to read minds. Thats low IQ.
151
posted on
11/01/2019 12:05:27 PM PDT
by
coaster123
(Distrust everyone under fifty.)
To: TalBlack
That would be something to see.
152
posted on
11/01/2019 12:59:59 PM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Johnson, Nixon and Clinton. This would make four not three. Idiots.
Who is the idiot? (Give it thought.)
153
posted on
11/01/2019 2:51:13 PM PDT
by
coaster123
(Distrust everyone under fifty.)
To: coaster123
Not sure what your point is. Andrew Johnson was impeached, Richard Nixon was and Bill Clinton was. Now they are going after Trump which would make it the fourth time in history not the third as the article states. So your point is?
154
posted on
11/01/2019 7:19:56 PM PDT
by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(If you want a definition of "bullying" just watch the Democrats in the Senate)
To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Examine your premises.
Do not teach what you dont know.
155
posted on
11/02/2019 12:01:52 PM PDT
by
coaster123
(Distrust everyone under fifty.)
To: jazusamo
I'm amazed the swamp and its media can't see how everyone can see they are corrupt imbeciles.
156
posted on
11/02/2019 12:10:21 PM PDT
by
Vision
(Obama corrupted, sought to weaken and fundamentally change America; he didn't plan on being stopped.)
To: jazusamo
Elections have consequences and if these maniacs win again our lives will be much worse.
157
posted on
11/02/2019 12:11:32 PM PDT
by
JerseyDvl
("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
To: coaster123
158
posted on
11/02/2019 12:28:00 PM PDT
by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(If you want a definition of "bullying" just watch the Democrats in the Senate)
To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Why do you call people idiots when they are knowledgeable and you are ignorant?
159
posted on
11/02/2019 1:26:39 PM PDT
by
coaster123
(Distrust everyone under fifty.)
To: coaster123
Johnson + Nixon + Clinton + Trump = 4 not 3
If I’m wrong please point it out and I will happily accept that but I am done trying to figure out what your calling me ignorant about.
160
posted on
11/02/2019 1:40:14 PM PDT
by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(If you want a definition of "bullying" just watch the Democrats in the Senate)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-162 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson