Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate change v. Killingly gas power plant. And the winner is …
CT Mirror ^

Posted on 10/31/2019 12:13:43 PM PDT by matt04

When the plan to build a natural gas power plant in Killingly first came up in 2016, the objections from folks in this northeast corner town of about 17,000 were pretty basic – they already had one, didn’t want another about a mile away, and didn’t want its emissions.

“Not another power plant,” was the rallying cry. Three years later, this remains the name of the local opposition group — or NAPP for short.

But since then, the furor over the proposed Killingly Energy Center (KEC) has expanded into a statewide environmental cause célèbre and is now something of a poster child for how not to tackle climate change. Those critical of the plan point out that a fossil fuel-run power plant that still emits greenhouse gases, even if it produces fewer of them than oil or coal plants, will not allow the state to meet a 2040 target of 100% zero carbon for the elector sector suggested by Gov. Ned Lamont last month.

...

Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan, D-Bethel, co-vice chair of the Energy and Technology Committee and leader of the legislative Clean Energy Caucus, said he’s spoken with the governor’s office about next steps. He also signed a letter from more than two-dozen legislators urging Lamont to oppose the Killingly plant.

“We don’t want a fossil fuel future for Connecticut,” he said. “The governor is committed to clean energy. We want to make sure we stay on that path. We don’t need the power and even if we did, we wouldn’t do this.”

(Excerpt) Read more at ctmirror.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: climatechange; energy; globalwarming; naturalgas
“We don’t want a fossil fuel future for Connecticut,” he said. “The governor is committed to clean energy. We want to make sure we stay on that path. We don’t need the power and even if we did, we wouldn’t do this.”

What magical unicorn will generate power at night or on days with little wind? At least they wont have to worry about who will turn out the lights.

1 posted on 10/31/2019 12:13:43 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: matt04

Yes! see tagline


2 posted on 10/31/2019 12:17:37 PM PDT by gr8eman (Stupid should hurt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Nancy Pelosi thinks Natural Gas isn’t a Fossil Fuel.

“I believe in natural gas as a clean, cheap alternative to fossil fuels,” she said at one point. Natural gas “is cheap, abundant and clean compared to fossil fuels,”


3 posted on 10/31/2019 12:19:43 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

So CT follows CA into the new stone age. Congratulations mindless Democrat Fascist Party voters. Enjoy your future living in the freezing dark.


4 posted on 10/31/2019 12:23:02 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Connecticut trying to beat California to the bottom.


5 posted on 10/31/2019 12:25:34 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

They can borrow surplus power from California. ;)


6 posted on 10/31/2019 12:27:55 PM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Who is John Galt?


7 posted on 10/31/2019 12:28:23 PM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

“... Natural gas is cheap, abundant and clean compared to fossil fuels ...”
She probably also thinks that people should get their meat at a grocery store where it’s manufactured instead of from an animal.


8 posted on 10/31/2019 12:41:21 PM PDT by BuffaloJack ("Security does not exist in nature. Everything has risk." Henry Savage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: matt04

How soon before all these Northeast loons feel the need for an armed seizure of Quebec Hydro?


9 posted on 10/31/2019 12:46:22 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

The northeast will be a bigger mess than California in a few years. They are getting rid of their nuke plant, coal and gas, and relying on solar and wind, which doesn’t work in a “polar vortex” type storm that will last for over a week.


10 posted on 10/31/2019 12:52:46 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

The reading and submission of a detailed book report of “Atlas Shrugged” should be a requirement for graduation from both High School and College.


11 posted on 10/31/2019 1:05:53 PM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Who is John Galt?
+++++
John Galt is the hero of the ...

Oh, wait. You must know the answer or you wouldn’t have asked the question.

Silly me.


12 posted on 10/31/2019 1:09:13 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

No way, the idiots here in NH oppose the “Northern Pass” because we did not need it here and it would have messed up their view up north.

The Northern Pass was a proposed additional right of way with high tension power lines through north NH. It would have brought electrical power from Quebec Hydro down through NH to Mass/RI & CT.

Eversource even proposed to bury the lines through Plymouth, NH so that it would not effect their view. There was only about 40 miles of new ROW. The rest would have gone over existing ROWs.

After lobbing the state for multiple years Eversource(the utility) gave up.

NIMBY


13 posted on 10/31/2019 1:18:50 PM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: matt04

“At least they wont have to worry about who will turn out the lights. “

nor will they have to worry about having their power cut off whenever it’s windy ...


14 posted on 10/31/2019 1:35:56 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Texas and other nat gas producers ought to help these anti-fossil fuel states achieve their 0% goal by shutting down our pipelines now. We have foreign customers for our fuel who pay a higher price for it than the old contracts with our northeastern states.


15 posted on 10/31/2019 1:46:16 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Whenever someone says “climate change” you know you are dealing with someone who is dangerously stupid.


16 posted on 10/31/2019 1:53:38 PM PDT by cgbg (Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Not all natural gas is a fossil fuel. Without even getting into the question of possible abiogenic origins; there is “renewable natural gas”, made from decomposing organic waste.


17 posted on 10/31/2019 2:28:58 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Abiogenic such as crustal subduction to a sufficient depth such that high temperature thermal decomposition of water bearing carbonate rock occurs?


18 posted on 10/31/2019 3:58:36 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

The reading and submission of a detailed book report of... most any book, and make it public on the WWW for all to see.

Sounds great, but such a plan might have limited my meteoric rise from Sub-grunt to full Grunt?


19 posted on 10/31/2019 4:00:01 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ozark Tom

Some other Freepers are better able to answer that — IIRC, I first heard about it here, from some proponents of the theory. I do know a bit about “renewable natural gas”, from anarobic digestion of organic waste. Our local landfill collects it (pipes are buried into the waste), and uses it to generate about 75 mW/hr of electricity.


20 posted on 10/31/2019 7:53:56 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson