"I am amazed anyone takes this declaration serious. I’ve been researching and all the people in the room when the call was made were identified except the CIA and FBI personnel.July 2 (2017) refers to Ciaramella losing his NSC post.It was announced that Eric Ciaramella, previously a GM-15, resigned from the CIA on July 2, 21 days before the phone call happened. So if he wasn’t in the room because he no longer worked for a government agency and wouldn’t have been allowed access to sensitive information, then how could he be the whistleblower?"
What you neglected to add, is, Cinderfella went back to LANGLEY.
What you further neglected to note, is the whistleblower SAID he WAS NOT PRESENT for the call.
"In the course of my official duties [up to July 2], I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials [Fiona Hill, et al] ... Over the past four months, more than half a dozen U.S. officials have informed me of various facts related to this effort. [Fiona Hill, Chalupa, CIA, et al]"
C'mon, dude, work a little harder. SCHIFF RECRUITED Cinderfella's best friend MISKO, who then ALTERED the online whistleblower form so Airwick could (ab)use it.
Airwick is the classic, textbook example of a cut-out.
“What you neglected to add, is, Cinderfella went back to LANGLEY.”
My entry:
“It was announced that Eric Ciaramella, previously a GM-15, resigned from the CIA on July 2, 21 days before the phone call happened.”
Ciaramella left his White house National Security Council post in mid-2017 amid concerns about negative leaks to the media. That’s when he went back to the CIA and left the CIA in early October of this year, 21 days before the phone call.
As for his admittance at not being present at the call, please check my post today on his position and what he can be facing. Don’t get caught up trying to figure out his positions and when he left. He may have been the person that told Schiff what he thought, but not what he knew. He was not a government employee at the time of the call and is talking hearsay unless they produce the real whistleblower. He, right now, has no witness to his statement and therefore no protection. So the question as to who the whistleblower is is still out there as Ciaramella is not he. (And the question of if a whistleblower even exists is still a reality) All he is is the rumor spreader he has always been and this time he has no protection.
rwood